In the case “Uber S.R.L. Y OTROS S/INFRACCIÓN LEY 24.769”, (CAU Nº 1859/2017), the Court upheld the Public Prosecutor’s motion to dismiss the complaint, holding that

On the 26th of February, 2021, in the case “Uber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s/INF. LEY 24.769”, (Expte Nº 8627/2016), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants

On the 15th of November, 2022, in the case “Uber argentina s.r.l. y otros s/inf. art .303’’, (CPE 648/2021), the Court dismissed the money laundering accusation - at the request of the Public Prosecutor - on the grounds that

On the 26th of October, 2021, in the case “Uber Argentina SRL s/infracción ley 24.760”, (CPE 1838/2016), the Court dismissed Uber on its alleged aggravated tax evasion regarding VAT and Income Tax.

On the 28th of December, 2020, in the case “Uber argentina s/ inf. ley 24.769”, (CPE 524/2019/2), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants of their charges

On the 14th of August, 2018, in the case “Recurso de hecho deducido por el Sindicato de Peones de Taxis de la Capital Federal en la causa Uber y otros s/ incidente de recurso extraordinario”,

On the 3rd of November, 2016, in the case “K., T. y otros”, (CCC 29155/2016/CA1), the Chamber upheld the decision by the previous Court, recognising Uber’s legality. It also added that

On the 1st of August, 2016, in the case “Kalanik, T. s/entorpecimiento de servicios”, (CAU N° 29155/16), in proceedings before the No. 13 National Criminal Court of Preliminary Investigation, the complaint that accused

On the 4th of September, 2023, in the case “Mejia Silva, Luis David sobre 6.1.47 – requisitos de los vehículos de transporte de pasajeros”, (case No. 108976/2023), the First Instance Court No. 13 in Criminal, Infractions, and Regulatory Matters declared null the proceedings

On the 28th of November, 2017, in the case “Marquez, Jose Bonifacio s/art. 1472:83 – Usar indebidamente el espacio público c/ fines lucrativos”, (case No. 258505/2017), the proceedings were declared null for

On the 30th of March, 2022, in the case “Crocci, Albano sobre 6.1.47 – requisitos de los vehículos de transporte de pasajeros”, (CAU 26630/2022-0), all proceedings at the administrative stage were declared null because

On the 2nd of October, 2019, in the case “Ojeda Eduardo Juan sobre 6.1.44 transporte de pasajeros”, (CAU 39237/2019-0), the Court acquitted the defendant and declared null the administrative ruling

On the 6th of December, 2019, in the case “Incidente de requerimiento a juicio en autos: Uber, Uber y otros sobre 1° ley 26.735 – art. 1°- evasión simple. ley 26.735 (modificación ley 24.769)”, (Expte. INC 15712/2016-10), the City of Buenos Aires initiated

On the 8th of March, 2021, in the case “Quisbert Choque, David Fernando sobre 6.1.47 – requisitos de los vehículos de transporte de pasajeros”, (CAU 3859/2020-0), the Court acquitted the defendant

On the 2nd of July, 2020, in the case “Sindicato de peones de taxis de la capital federal y otros contra ministro de desarrollo urbano y transporte y otros sobre otras demandas contra autoridad administrativa – genérico”, (File No. 3065/2016-0), the representative for the Sole

In the case “Uber y otros sobre 83 -Usar indebidamente el espacio público c/fines lucrativos (no autorizados)”, (File No. 17480/19), the Court upheld the ruling of Chamber II of the Criminal

On the 10th of February, 2021, in the case “Sajoux, Nicolás y otros s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: ‘Nicolás Sajoux (UBER) s/ infr. art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio público c/ fines lucrativos (no autorizadas)’”, (File No, 15859/18), the Court acquitted

On the 15th of August, 2019, in the case “UBER s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: ‘Incidente de apelación en autos: UBER y otros s/ art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio público

On the 18th of June, 2018, in the case “NN (UBER) s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: ‘Incidente de apelación por clausura/bloqueo de página web en todo el país en autos: NN

On the 27th September, 2022, in the case “Incidente de apelación en autos Perez Ramos, Miguel Angel sobre 6.1.44 – Transporte de pasajeros”, (INC 136886/2021-1), the Second Chamber revoked the initial