-
A. Bianchi, “UBER: Legal Obsolescence Amid A Technological Revolution”, el Cronista, 13/04/2016
The author explains that Uber is a technological phenomenon that brings together a bunch of tools already in existence, such as phones, cars and even
-
A. Bianchi & L. Galarce, “An Approach To The Regulation Of The Collaborative Economy (With Particular Consideration To Transportation Services)”, El Derecho, Administrative Law Magazine, September 2020, No. 9; 09/10/2020
The authors explain that a “collaborative economy” is characterised by offering a new model of socioeconomic relationships between
-
F. Lonigro, “Demanded By The People, Resisted By Officials”, Perfil, 14/05/2017
The author demonstrates that Uber offers an intermediary service between two parties who wish to enter into a paid transportation
-
F. Toller, “Argentina Is Obsessed With Regulation”, Télam Digital, 01/02/2017
The author notes that Uber is an intermediary platform between citizens. It is designed to make information available on-demand
-
S. Maqueda, “Taxes To The Digital Economy, And The National Constitution”, Infobae, 21/12/2017
The author addresses the current challenges involved in applying certain taxes to the digital economy
-
I. Boulin, “Uber And The Right To Work”, Infobae, 17/02/2017
The author notes that blocking a website or an app infringes the right to freedom of expression, since it prohibits
-
F. Morandini, “Don Quijote And Uber’s Windmills”, Infobae, 27/09/2017
The author highlights the contribution that IT and Communications could bring to, and the potential it has to improve
-
A.D. Perotti, “Uber In The Labyrinth Of Justice”, La Nación, 09/01/2018
The EU’s Court of Justice, while determining whether the intermediary service provided by Uber should be classified as a transportation service, ruled that it is not, but rather a service that
-
L.E.Gómez, “A Judicial Decision That Violates The Principles of a Free Internet”, Clarín, 19/02/2018
The author points out that CABA’s Judicial Power, upon blocking Uber’s website nationwide
-
C. Highton, “The UBER Case From The Perspective Of Argentinian Employment Legislation”, abogados.com, 30/06/2017
The author tackles the subject matter of Uber from the point of view of Argentinian employment legislation. He highlights that there is no employment relationship
-
R.Gil Lavedra, “A Ruling That Affects Freedom of Expression”, Clarín, 06/05/2017
The author highlights that, in line with UN and IACHR standards, blocking websites like Uber constitutes a clear violation to freedom of expression on the internet. This measure
-
D. Serebrinsky, “The ‘Uber’ Case In The United States: A Landmark Ruling On Consumers’ Rights To Freedom Of Choice”, La Ley, 28/12/2016
The author discusses the ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. He explains
-
D. Serebrinsky, “About The Legality Of The Uber App: Two Rulings From The Supreme Federal Court Of Brazil”, La Ley, 2020-F. No. 197; 21/10/2020
The author explains two rulings issued by the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil, which held that private transportation services are regulated by substantive national laws, and that the local
-
P. Vargas de Brea, “The Injunction Against Uber’s Contravention: One Contravention To the Inter-American System Of Freedom Of Expression, - Commentary On The Ruling ‘Appeal Of Preventative Closure under Article 29 LPC in the case of UBER SRL re Violation of 83 CC’”, El Dial, 11/05/2016
The author comments on the preventative injunction that CABA’s Judicial Power issued in 2016. This measure ordered the preventative blocking of Uber’s website and app
-
P. A. Cardozo García, “Blockage Of Websites And Mobile Applications By Local Judges. A Violation Of Federalism And Freedom Of Expression On The Internet: The ‘Uber’ Case”, La Ley 02/11/2018, Año LXXXII No. 207, Tomo LALEY 2018-F
The author tackles the blocking of websites and mobile applications like Uber. He analyses how it constitutes a transgression of federalism and a violation of the freedom of expression
-
R. Cuervo, “Mendoza And Regulation Of Uber. A Good Path For Disruptive Technological Innovations”, LL Gran Cuyo 05/05/2020, online citation: AR/DOC/1328/2020
The author comments on Mendoza’s Mobility Law No. 9086, which specifically regulates private transportation services offered by transportation network
-
C. Lanza Castelli, “Are We Finally Coming To The End Of The Debate About Uber’s Legality?”, Abogados.com.ar, 03/05/2020
The author addresses Uber’s difficult situation from a criminal law perspective and comments on the complaint filed by the Taxi Drivers’ Union against
-
J. M. Soria Acuña, “The Tax System In The Face Of New Technologies”, La Nación, 03/12/2017
The author points out that tax laws, like legislation in general, usually tail behind technological and economic changes. This
-
M. Tessio, “The State Is Absent In The Hunt Against Uber”, Infobae, 22/05/2018
The author analyses whether the actions of a group of individuals who detain Uber drivers in order that an infringement report may be issued and contraventional proceedings
-
L. E. Gómez & I. Boulin, “Uber And Freedom Of Expression”, La Ley 26/05/2021, online citation: TR LALEY AR/DOC/1480/2021
The authors point out that blocking platforms, websites and apps infringes the principle of network neutrality as well as the rights protected by both the National Constitution and various