In the case “Uber S.R.L. Y OTROS S/INFRACCIÓN LEY 24.769”, (CAU Nº 1859/2017), the Court upheld the Public Prosecutor’s motion to dismiss the complaint, holding that

On the 26th of February, 2021, in the case “Uber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s/INF. LEY 24.769”, (Expte Nº 8627/2016), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants

On the 15th of November, 2022, in the case “Uber argentina s.r.l. y otros s/inf. art .303’’, (CPE 648/2021), the Court dismissed the money laundering accusation - at the request of the Public Prosecutor - on the grounds that

On the 26th of October, 2021, in the case “Uber Argentina SRL s/infracción ley 24.760”, (CPE 1838/2016), the Court dismissed Uber on its alleged aggravated tax evasion regarding VAT and Income Tax.

On the 28th of December, 2020, in the case “Uber argentina s/ inf. ley 24.769”, (CPE 524/2019/2), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants of their charges

On the 14th of August, 2018, in the case “Recurso de hecho deducido por el Sindicato de Peones de Taxis de la Capital Federal en la causa Uber y otros s/ incidente de recurso extraordinario”,

On the 3rd of November, 2016, in the case “K., T. y otros”, (CCC 29155/2016/CA1), the Chamber upheld the decision by the previous Court, recognising Uber’s legality. It also added that

On the 1st of August, 2016, in the case “Kalanik, T. s/entorpecimiento de servicios”, (CAU N° 29155/16), in proceedings before the No. 13 National Criminal Court of Preliminary Investigation, the complaint that accused