On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case “Asociación de Propietarios de Taxi de Mendoza (APROTAM) c/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza p/acción de amparo", (CAU CUIJ N° 13-04464442-2), the Court rejected the amparo action filed by the Taxi Owners’ Association of Mendoza, considering that the chosen action was not appropriate for this particular case. It held that in none of the combined cases did the plaintiffs justify what serious or irreparable damage they would face if they raised the issue using a declaratory claim of unconstitutionality. Additionally, the Court emphasised that, for the amparo action to proceed, the contested act must clearly be arbitrary or illegal, noting that neither Law 9086, nor its regulatory decree, could be considered as such.