Río Grande
-
Tierra del Fuego Court Once Again Clearly States That Uber is Legal
Once again, the Tierra del Fuego Court determined that Uber is legal, and as a result, on the 14th of October, 2024, in the case “Correa Adrian Gabriel s/ Recurso de Apelación art. 23
-
Uber Is Legal In Río Grande: Acquittals Continue Due To Unconstitutionality Of The Ordinance Banning Uber
On the 8th of October, 2024, in the case “Perez Oscar Saul s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 259970, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court acquitted another driver who had provided transportation services
-
Another Acquittal For Using The Uber App, Following The Declaration Of Unconstitutionality Of The Ordinance Prohibiting Uber
On the 8th of October, 2024, in the case “Albornoz José María Jesús s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260729, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court acquitted the defendant. The Court considered that the case had
-
The Municipal Infractions Court in Río Grande Fulfills the Arranged Dues in the Case “Martínez Leonardo Alberto re: appeal under Article 23, Section 5 of the Penal Code”
On the 8th of October, 2024, in the case “Novoa Monica Leopoldina s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260164, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court dismissed the defendant upon recognising that there existed
-
Once Again, Another Driver Is Acquitted Due To Indications Of Participation Of An Entrapment Agent
On the 3rd of October, 2024, in the case “Calero Nicolas Hernán s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260658, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court acquitted a driver, who provided passenger transportation services
-
Acquittal of a Driver Due to Possible Participation of an Entrapment Agent
On the 3rd of October, 2024, in the case “Grahl Juan José s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260309, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court, considering the possible involvement of an entrapment agent,
-
Tierra del Fuego Court Acquitted Another Driver And Ordered Future Proceedings To Comply With Precedent Set In “Quisbert” Case, In Which Uber’s Legality Is Confirmed
On the 14th of October, 2024, in the case “Martinez, Leonardo Alberto s/ Recurso De Apelacion Art. 23 Inc. 5 C.P.”, Expte. 5772/2024, the Criminal Court of the Northern Judicial District
-
Tierra del Fuego Court Declares The Ordinance Banning Passenger Transportation Via Intermediary Apps Unconstitutional In Río Grande And Acquits The Driver
On the 15th of December, 2023, in the case “Quisbert, Alejandro Javier s/ recurso de apelación art. 32 inc. 5º C.P.”, Expte. 5635/2023, the Criminal Court of the Northern Judicial District of Tierra del Fuego declared
Ushuaia
-
Tierra del Fuego Court Declares Ushuaia’s Ordinance 5283/2017 Unconstitutional
On the 13th of August, 2024, in the case “Avellaneda, Roman Miguel s/Apelación art. 35 O.M. No 2778’ originario No R-036894-0/2023 del Juzgado Municipal de Faltas y sus acumulados […]”, Expte. N° 5091/2024, the Criminal Court of the Southern Judicial District of Tierra del Fuego
-
Another Ruling in Tierra del Fuego Reaffirms the Unconstitutionality of the Ordinance Banning Uber
On the 7th of November, 2024, in the case “Barrera, Hector Elias s/Apelación art. 35 O.M. N° 2778’, y sus acumulados […]”,