On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case “Herrera Natalia Carolina s/ Recurso de queja por apelación denegada”, (Expte: 3136/2022), the Court ordered the driver’s vehicle to be returned and granted her appeal, without requiring advance payment of the fine. The Court understood that a hypothetically favourable ruling in the interest of the defendant would be ineffective in compensating for time elapsed without due access to her withheld property. Finally, the Court warned that 60 days of retention had elapsed since the date of the report in which the seizure took place, yet the vehicle had not been handed over, and therefore the retention was unjustified by the administration.