{"id":765,"date":"2024-06-04T01:30:05","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T01:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=765"},"modified":"2024-08-15T22:14:42","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T22:14:42","slug":"la-justicia-concedio-el-recurso-de-apelacion-sin-exigir-el-pago-previo-de-la-multa-tucuman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-concedio-el-recurso-de-apelacion-sin-exigir-el-pago-previo-de-la-multa-tucuman\/","title":{"rendered":"The Court Concedes An Appeal Without Advance Payment of Fine (Tucum\u00e1n)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 26th of June, 2023, in the case, \u201c&nbsp;<em>Palomino Luis Armando s\/ Recurso de queja por apelacion denegada<\/em>&nbsp;\", (Expte: 823\/2023), the Tucum\u00e1n Court, regarding the complaint filed by a private individual, granted the request for the return of their seized vehicle without advance payment of the fine. The Court understood that in this specific case the automatic application of the principle \u2018solve et repete\u2019 assumes an irrational measure that exceeded the government\u2019s tax-collective authority. This infringed upon higher-ranking rights such as free trade and the right to a fair trial.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7Sentencia-Queja-y-Devolucion-del-auto-Palomino-24.06.23-1-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (7)Sentencia Queja y Devolucion del auto - Palomino 24.06.23 (1) (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-b798c50b-22e6-4ce8-a1b1-4d86babc1bf3\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7Sentencia-Queja-y-Devolucion-del-auto-Palomino-24.06.23-1-1.pdf\">(7)Sentencia Queja y Devolucion del auto &#8211; Palomino 24.06.23 (1) (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7Sentencia-Queja-y-Devolucion-del-auto-Palomino-24.06.23-1-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-b798c50b-22e6-4ce8-a1b1-4d86babc1bf3\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-104-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1288 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-104-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-104-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-104-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-104.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/ilustracion-plana-dia-abogados_21240192.htm#query=corte%20suprema%20d%20ela%20provicnia&amp;position=38&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=ais\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa&nbsp;\u201cPalomino Luis Armando s\/ Recurso de queja por apelacion denegada\u201d,&nbsp;(Expte: 823\/2023), del 26\/06\/2023, la Justicia de &nbsp;Tucum\u00e1n hizo lugar al recurso de queja interpuesto por un particular haciendo lugar al pedido de restituci\u00f3n del veh\u00edculo secuestrado sin exigir [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,118,15],"tags":[94,96,95,93],"class_list":["post-765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-tucuman","category-jurisprudencia-del-norte-argentino","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-derecho-de-acceso-a-la-justicia","tag-devolucion-inmediata-del-vehiculo","tag-solve-et-repete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=765"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3378,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/765\/revisions\/3378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}