{"id":763,"date":"2024-06-04T01:29:29","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T01:29:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=763"},"modified":"2024-08-15T22:15:57","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T22:15:57","slug":"otra-vez-la-justicia-determina-que-se-debe-restituir-el-vehiculo-sin-exigir-el-pago-previo-de-la-multa-tucuman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-la-justicia-determina-que-se-debe-restituir-el-vehiculo-sin-exigir-el-pago-previo-de-la-multa-tucuman\/","title":{"rendered":"Once Again The Court Determines That A Vehicle Must Be Returned Without Demanding Advance Payment of the Fine (Tucum\u00e1n)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Herrera Natalia Carolina s\/ Recurso de queja por apelaci\u00f3n denegada<\/em>\u201d, (Expte: 3136\/2022), the Court ordered the driver\u2019s vehicle to be returned and granted her appeal, without requiring advance payment of the fine. The Court understood that a hypothetically favourable ruling in the interest of the defendant would be ineffective in compensating for time elapsed without due access to her withheld property. Finally, the Court warned that 60 days of retention had elapsed since the date of the report in which the seizure took place, yet the vehicle had not been handed over, and therefore the retention was unjustified by the administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-Herrera.-Sentencia-devolucion-vehiculo-09.01.23.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (6) Herrera. Sentencia devolucio\u0301n vehi\u0301culo - 09.01.23.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-6ef83a62-ed7d-4641-91f5-f7a8a54ded64\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-Herrera.-Sentencia-devolucion-vehiculo-09.01.23.pdf\">(6) Herrera. Sentencia devolucio\u0301n vehi\u0301culo &#8211; 09.01.23<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-Herrera.-Sentencia-devolucion-vehiculo-09.01.23.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-6ef83a62-ed7d-4641-91f5-f7a8a54ded64\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-105-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1291 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-105-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-105-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-105-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-105.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/retrato-hermosa-nina-triste-closeup_7927214.htm#query=multa&amp;position=19&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=sph\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cHerrera Natalia Carolina s\/ Recurso de queja por apelaci\u00f3n denegada\u201d, (Expte: 3136\/2022), 09\/01\/2023, el Juzgado, orden\u00f3 que se le restituya al conductor el veh\u00edculo y se le conceda el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n, sin requerir el pago previo [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,118,15],"tags":[94,96,95,93],"class_list":["post-763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-tucuman","category-jurisprudencia-del-norte-argentino","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-derecho-de-acceso-a-la-justicia","tag-devolucion-inmediata-del-vehiculo","tag-solve-et-repete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=763"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3379,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763\/revisions\/3379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}