{"id":761,"date":"2024-06-04T01:28:53","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T01:28:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=761"},"modified":"2024-08-15T22:31:04","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T22:31:04","slug":"una-vez-mas-no-es-legitimo-exigir-el-pago-de-la-multa-para-apelar-y-recuperar-el-vehiculo-tucuman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-no-es-legitimo-exigir-el-pago-de-la-multa-para-apelar-y-recuperar-el-vehiculo-tucuman\/","title":{"rendered":"Once Again, It Is Not Legitimate To Demand Payment Of A Fine In Order To Appeal And Return A Vehicle (Tucum\u00e1n)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Moyano Ram\u00f3n Ariel s\/ Recurso de queja por apelaci\u00f3n denegada<\/em>\u201d, (Expte: 3200\/2022), the Court declared that access to justice through an appeal of an administrative penalty cannot be blocked by bureaucratic requirements, since this would demand the advance payment of the fine before the appeal can proceed. Furthermore, the Court held that the seizure and\/or retention of the vehicle implied an absolute and permanent violation to the right of property. The Court therefore granted the request for the return of the vehicle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Moyano.-Sentencia-Reintegro-Vehiculo-Rojas-09.01.23.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (5) Moyano. Sentencia Reintegro Vehi\u0301culo - Rojas 09.01.23.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-9791b179-1cc1-430c-ac44-c7b88523857d\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Moyano.-Sentencia-Reintegro-Vehiculo-Rojas-09.01.23.pdf\">(5) Moyano. Sentencia Reintegro Vehi\u0301culo &#8211; Rojas 09.01.23<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Moyano.-Sentencia-Reintegro-Vehiculo-Rojas-09.01.23.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-9791b179-1cc1-430c-ac44-c7b88523857d\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-103-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1287 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-103-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-103-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-103-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-103.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/gente-diminuta-recibiendo-hoja-papel-ilustracion-plana-fina_11235924.htm#query=multa&amp;position=17&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=sph\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cMoyano Ram\u00f3n Ariel s\/ Recurso de queja por apelaci\u00f3n denegada\u201d, (Expte: 3200\/2022), 9\/01\/2023, el Juzgado aclar\u00f3 que el acceso a la justicia a trav\u00e9s del recurso de apelaci\u00f3n de una sanci\u00f3n administrativa, no puede verse cercenado por [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,118,15],"tags":[94,96,95,93],"class_list":["post-761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-tucuman","category-jurisprudencia-del-norte-argentino","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-derecho-de-acceso-a-la-justicia","tag-devolucion-inmediata-del-vehiculo","tag-solve-et-repete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=761"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3395,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/761\/revisions\/3395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}