{"id":743,"date":"2024-06-04T01:23:01","date_gmt":"2024-06-04T01:23:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=743"},"modified":"2024-12-16T21:30:45","modified_gmt":"2024-12-16T21:30:45","slug":"denegatoria-de-medida-cautelar-de-bloqueo-de-la-plataforma-uber-al-afectar-el-derecho-a-la-libertad-de-expresion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/denegatoria-de-medida-cautelar-de-bloqueo-de-la-plataforma-uber-al-afectar-el-derecho-a-la-libertad-de-expresion\/","title":{"rendered":"Rejection Of Injunction To Block Uber Platform Since It Affects The Right To Freedom Of Expression"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"translation-block\">On the 30th of April, 2024, in the case \u201cAutoridad Metropolitana de Transporte c\/ Uber Argentina y\/o Uber Technologier s\/ Medida Cautelar\u201d, (Exp. FSA 5525\/2023\/CA1), Chamber 1 of the Federal Administrative Litigation Court of Salta ruled against a request for an injunction seeking to ban the \u201cUber\u201d platform in the province. The Court held that blocking apps and digital platforms must be strictly analysed and imposed using restrictive criteria, as it directly affects the freedom of expression. Based on this reasoning, it upheld the lower court\u2019s ruling and rejected the requested injunction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Rechazo-apelacion-de-medida-cautelar-AMT.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (5) Rechazo apelacio\u0301n de medida cautelar AMT.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-2de86c79-de7f-4f54-b2b3-293866cb3e32\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Rechazo-apelacion-de-medida-cautelar-AMT.pdf\">(5) Rechazo apelacio\u0301n de medida cautelar AMT<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-Rechazo-apelacion-de-medida-cautelar-AMT.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-2de86c79-de7f-4f54-b2b3-293866cb3e32\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-39-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1175 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-39-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-39-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-39-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-39.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/diseno-bodegones-revolucion_17118989.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=1&amp;position=21&amp;uuid=76d00a4b-7706-47d7-ba35-6393d6a93ced\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Sala I de la C\u00e1mara en lo Contencioso Administrativo Federal de Salta en los autos \u201cAutoridad Metropolitana de Transporte c\/ Uber Argentina y\/o Uber Technologier s\/ Medida Cautelar\u201d (Exp. FSA 5525\/2023\/CA1) el pasado 30\/04\/2024, ante un pedido de una [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,117,15],"tags":[108,106,107,109],"class_list":["post-743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-salta","category-jurisprudencia-del-norte-argentino","tag-censura-previa-y-neutralidad-de-red","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-economia-colaborativa","tag-libertad-de-expresion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=743"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/743\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3389,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/743\/revisions\/3389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}