{"id":514,"date":"2024-06-03T13:13:01","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T13:13:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=514"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:06:19","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:06:19","slug":"el-supremo-tribunal-federal-de-brasil-reitera-que-conducir-uber-es-legal-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-supremo-tribunal-federal-de-brasil-reitera-que-conducir-uber-es-legal-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Supreme Court Of Brazil Reiterates That Driving Using Uber Is Legal (Brazil)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Demanda por incumplimiento del principio fundamental 449 Distrito Federal<\/em>\u201d, (File No. ADPF 449\/DF), the unconstitutionality of the Municipal Law of Strength was declared. This was on the grounds that: (i) since Uber and taxi services are fundamentally different, they cannot be analysed under the same regulatory framework; (ii) when the law restricts markets by creating entry barriers to new competitors, it indirectly favours market dominance, eliminates competition and arbitrarily increases profits; (iii) restrictive regulations on individual transportation activity are a way of transferring resources from consumers to taxi licence-holders, violating the constitutional principles of equality and free initiative; (iv) it is the Judiciary Power\u2019s role to invalidate regulatory acts that establish disproportionate restrictions on free initiative and professional freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-Supremo-Tribunal-Federal-ADPF-449-_-DF.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (2) Supremo Tribunal Federal ADPF 449 _ DF.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-4161a884-4131-492f-9324-a958b418e205\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-Supremo-Tribunal-Federal-ADPF-449-_-DF.pdf\">(2) Supremo Tribunal Federal ADPF 449 _ DF<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-Supremo-Tribunal-Federal-ADPF-449-_-DF.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-4161a884-4131-492f-9324-a958b418e205\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-141-1024x683.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1428 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-141-1024x683.png 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-141-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-141-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-141.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/feliz-cliente-satisfecho-acaba-comprar-coche-nuevo-concesionario-vehiculos_11136167.htm#query=automovil&amp;position=2&amp;from_view=author&amp;uuid=240dafac-cdd8-45ce-828b-92b2f284bb2b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cDemanda por incumplimiento del principio fundamental 449 Distrito Federal\u201d, (expte. ADPF 449\/DF) 08\/05\/2019, se declara la inconstitucionalidad la Ley Municipal de Fortaleza entendiendo que: (i) al ser los servicios de Uber y taxi esencialmente diferentes, no pueden [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[31,24,5,20,23,21],"tags":[106,105,85,84,110,100],"class_list":["post-514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-de-los-consumidores","category-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-regulatoria-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-derecho-de-los-consumidores","tag-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-razonabilidad-y-proporcionalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=514"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3318,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/514\/revisions\/3318"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}