{"id":500,"date":"2024-06-03T12:49:02","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:49:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=500"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:24:38","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:24:38","slug":"otro-tribunal-determino-que-no-existe-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-tribunal-determino-que-no-existe-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Court Determines That No Employment Relationship Exists Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<strong><em>Luiz Fernando Fordiani De Souza c\/ UBER do Brasil Tecnolog\u00eda Ltda<\/em><\/strong>\u201d, (Expte. N\u00b0. 1000508-73.2017.5.02.0026), the Court rejected the existence of an employment relationship, as alleged by the claimant, on account of the requirements established in Articles 2 and 3 of the Brazilian Labour Code(<em>Consolida\u00e7\u00e3o das Leis do Trabalho<\/em>) not being met, and therefore dismissed the claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-De-Souza.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (2) De Souza.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-fba831fa-88a0-4ace-a7b0-77e010bb3d47\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-De-Souza.pdf\">(2) De Souza<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2-De-Souza.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-fba831fa-88a0-4ace-a7b0-77e010bb3d47\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-165-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1517 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-165-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-165-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-165-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-165.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/mujer-abrocha-cinturon-seguridad-coche_27334434.htm#from_view=detail_alsolike\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cLuiz Fernando Fordiani De Souza c\/ UBER do Brasil Tecnolog\u00eda Ltda\u201d, (Expte. N\u00b0. 1000508-73.2017.5.02.0026), 12\/06\/2017, el Tribunal declara inexistente la relaci\u00f3n laboral alegada por el demandante, por no haberse configurado los requisitos de los art\u00edculos 2 y [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84,110],"class_list":["post-500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=500"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/500\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3342,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/500\/revisions\/3342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}