{"id":498,"date":"2024-06-03T12:48:29","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:48:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=498"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:25:06","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:25:06","slug":"un-nuevo-fallo-determino-la-inexistencia-del-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/un-nuevo-fallo-determino-la-inexistencia-del-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"A New Ruling Determined That An Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers Does Not Exist (Brazil)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Artur Soares Neto c\/ UBER do Brasil Tecnolog\u00eda Ltda., UBER International B.V. e UBER International Holding B.V<\/em>\u201d, (Sentencia N\u00b0 0011863-62.2016.5.03.0137), rejected the existence of an employment relationship between the claimant and Uber, basing this decision on the fact that the latter does not exercise any sort of control over the \u201cdrivers\u201d (Driver-Partner). The arguments underpinning the decision were: (i) the \u201cDriver-Partners\u2019\u201d freedom to choose when to connect to the app; (ii) the possibility to be absent without notifying Uber, as no authorisation is required; (iii) the \u201cDriver-Partners\u201d\u2019 freedom to accept trips; and subsequently, (iv) not to accept or to cancel trips after having accepted them; (v) the route is determined by the \u201cDriver-Partner\u201d; (vi) the ability to use competing apps, meaning there is no exclusivity between the \u201cDriver-Partner\u201d and Uber; (vii) Uber is not a transportation company; (viii) Uber is a platform that connects drivers and passengers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SOARES.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (6) SOARES.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-de46fb9e-86e0-4d0d-b2d9-3ef4280b6c76\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SOARES.pdf\">(6) SOARES<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SOARES.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-de46fb9e-86e0-4d0d-b2d9-3ef4280b6c76\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-30-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1166 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-30-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-30-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-30-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-30.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/corte-martillo-libros-juicio-concepto-ley_8760916.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=1&amp;position=34&amp;uuid=ccb4303c-b4d7-44bd-bdaa-cc236ae15488\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cArtur Soares Neto c\/ UBER do Brasil Tecnolog\u00eda Ltda., UBER International B.V. e UBER International Holding B.V.\u201d, (Sentencia N\u00b0 0011863-62.2016.5.03.0137), 30\/01\/2017, el Juzgado determin\u00f3 la inexistencia de una relaci\u00f3n laboral entre el actor y Uber, bas\u00e1ndose en [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84,110,102],"class_list":["post-498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-revolucion-tecnologica"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=498"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3343,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/498\/revisions\/3343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}