{"id":494,"date":"2024-06-03T12:47:19","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=494"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:26:00","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:26:00","slug":"el-tribunal-superior-de-trabajo-de-brasil-confirmo-que-no-hay-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-tribunal-superior-de-trabajo-de-brasil-confirmo-que-no-hay-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"The Superior Labour Court of Brazil Confirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Brazil)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Marcio Vieira Jacob &#8211; Uber do Brasil Tecnologia Ltda. e outros<\/em>\u201d, (expte. N\u00b0 TST-RR-1000123-89.2017.5.02.0038), the Court concluded that no employment or dependent relationship existed between Uber and its drivers due to the lack of subordination, an essential characteristic of employment. It based its decision on the fact that drivers retain flexibility regarding the fares they accept and the number of clients they serve. As such, the Court held that Uber acts as a partner rather than an employer, since the drivers receive between 75% and 80% of the total fare. The ruling classified drivers as independent contractors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Marcio-Vieira-Jacob-TST-decision-eng.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (8) Marcio Vieira Jacob - TST decision (eng).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-446b8958-21d2-4695-8a08-f03be7912059\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Marcio-Vieira-Jacob-TST-decision-eng.pdf\">(8) Marcio Vieira Jacob &#8211; TST decision (eng)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Marcio-Vieira-Jacob-TST-decision-eng.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-446b8958-21d2-4695-8a08-f03be7912059\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-169-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1521 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-169-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-169-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-169-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-169.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/hombre-guapo-sentado-coche-probarlo_7870081.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=7&amp;position=21&amp;uuid=40bada12-07fa-42e2-bceb-3b357cfd566e\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cMarcio Vieira Jacob &#8211; Uber do Brasil Tecnologia Ltda. e outros\u201d (expte. N\u00b0 TST-RR-1000123-89.2017.5.02.0038), 07\/02\/2020, el Tribunal concluy\u00f3 que no existe un v\u00ednculo o relaci\u00f3n de dependencia entre Uber y sus conductores por la ausencia de elementos [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84,110,102],"class_list":["post-494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-revolucion-tecnologica"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3345,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions\/3345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}