{"id":484,"date":"2024-06-03T12:44:25","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:44:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=484"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:28:24","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:28:24","slug":"un-nuevo-precedente-en-el-que-se-afirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/un-nuevo-precedente-en-el-que-se-afirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/","title":{"rendered":"A New Precedent Affirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Brazil)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Fabio Gil Da Silva vs. Uber do Brasil<\/em>\u201d (expte. N\u00b0 0010148-42.2019.5.03.0181), the Court found that the Uber app is limited to connecting drivers with users, and although Uber conducts checks, inspections and processes payments, the Court decided that these practices were insufficient to undermine the driver\u2019s autonomy in providing the service, and therefore, it was not an employment relationship. It further held that the fact the drivers pay for vehicle-related expenses demonstrates that they individually assume the business risks. Finally, the Court ruled that the platform\u2019s rules of use align with traffic laws and basic societal laws, rather than serving as a means for Uber to manage the drivers\u2019 workforce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/14-Sentenca-Gil-Da-Silva.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (14) Sentenc\u0327a Gil Da Silva.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-240c85ab-42c7-4355-9bfb-c2508e5c640d\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/14-Sentenca-Gil-Da-Silva.pdf\">(14) Sentenc\u0327a Gil Da Silva<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/14-Sentenca-Gil-Da-Silva.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-240c85ab-42c7-4355-9bfb-c2508e5c640d\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1518 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/conductor-uber-elegante-dando-paseo-taxi_21814119.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=1&amp;position=34&amp;uuid=2dc36423-bcee-4874-9619-83e65d8f0461\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cFabio Gil Da Silva vs. Uber do Brasil\u201d (expte. N\u00b0 0010148-42.2019.5.03.0181), 21\/03\/2019, el Tribunal valor\u00f3 que la aplicaci\u00f3n de Uber se limita a vincular a conductores con usuarios, y si bien Uber practica controles, inspecciones y cobros, [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19],"tags":[106,101,110],"class_list":["post-484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=484"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3351,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484\/revisions\/3351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}