{"id":474,"date":"2024-06-03T12:41:42","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:41:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=474"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:31:20","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:31:20","slug":"la-justicia-de-australia-tambien-decreto-que-no-hay-contrato-de-trabajo-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-australia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-de-australia-tambien-decreto-que-no-hay-contrato-de-trabajo-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-australia\/","title":{"rendered":"The Australia Justice Also Decreed That There Is No Employment Contract Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Australia)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Oze Igiehon vs Rasier Operations BV<\/em>\u201d, the Court ruled against the \u201cwrongful dismissal\u201d claim and affirmed that the relationship between parties - driver and Uber - was not of an employment contract nature. The Court followed this by acknowledging that the deactivation of the driver\u2019s account - based on low qualifications and constant passenger complaints - matched the Terms and Conditions he had agreed to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-District-Court-of-Western-Australia-in-Civil.-OZE-IGIEHON-v-Rasier-Operations-BV-2016-WADC-174.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (5) District Court of Western Australia in Civil. OZE-IGIEHON v Rasier Operations BV - [2016] WADC 174.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-80e41180-601a-49da-93d2-d5c2ea40e852\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-District-Court-of-Western-Australia-in-Civil.-OZE-IGIEHON-v-Rasier-Operations-BV-2016-WADC-174.pdf\">(5) District Court of Western Australia in Civil. OZE-IGIEHON v Rasier Operations BV &#8211; [2016] WADC 174<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/5-District-Court-of-Western-Australia-in-Civil.-OZE-IGIEHON-v-Rasier-Operations-BV-2016-WADC-174.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-80e41180-601a-49da-93d2-d5c2ea40e852\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cOze Igiehon vs Rasier Operations BV\u201d, 2016, el Juzgado fall\u00f3 en contra de la demanda por \u2018\u2018despido sin causa\u201d y afirm\u00f3 que la relaci\u00f3n entre las partes \u2013conductor y Uber\u2013 no era la de un contrato de [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84,110],"class_list":["post-474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=474"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3357,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474\/revisions\/3357"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}