{"id":472,"date":"2024-06-03T12:41:08","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:41:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=472"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:31:49","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:31:49","slug":"el-consejo-de-paris-afirma-que-el-conflicto-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-es-comercial-no-laboral-francia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-consejo-de-paris-afirma-que-el-conflicto-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-es-comercial-no-laboral-francia\/","title":{"rendered":"The Paris Council Affirms That The Conflict Between Uber And Uber Drivers Is Commercial, Not Employment-Related (France)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Judgment on the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction Ruling at first instance and in contested proceedings<\/em>\u201d, (File No. F 17\/04674), the Court concluded that: (i) the contract that binds an Uber driver with Uber is of a commercial nature; (ii) it lacks jurisdiction over the matter, as it does not concern an employment dispute; (iii) the matter should be referred to the Paris Commercial Court, which has the exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the parties complied with their contractual obligations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/16-Uber-CPH-Paris-June-28-2018-1-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (16) Uber CPH Paris June 28, 2018 (1) (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-117cf49e-a9e8-4b7d-b2ff-3c29832b2c1b\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/16-Uber-CPH-Paris-June-28-2018-1-1.pdf\">(16) Uber CPH Paris June 28, 2018 (1) (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/16-Uber-CPH-Paris-June-28-2018-1-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-117cf49e-a9e8-4b7d-b2ff-3c29832b2c1b\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1459 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/concepto-igualdad-justicia-sentencia-ley_17431533.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=8&amp;position=35&amp;uuid=66d6881d-5643-4f28-992d-639eaa6e15e8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cJudgment on the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction Ruling at first instance and in contested proceedings\u201d, (File No. F 17\/04674), 28\/06\/2018, el Tribunal concluye que: (i) el contrato que une al conductor con Uber es de naturaleza comercial; [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,19,23,21],"tags":[84],"class_list":["post-472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-legalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=472"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3358,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472\/revisions\/3358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}