{"id":460,"date":"2024-06-03T12:37:47","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:37:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=460"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:19:39","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:19:39","slug":"los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-son-empleados-de-la-aplicacion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-son-empleados-de-la-aplicacion\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Drivers Are Not Employees Of The Application"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 26th of June, 2023, in the case, \u201c&nbsp;<em>\u201cRazak v. Uber Techs., Inc.\u201d,<\/em>&nbsp;the District Court in Pennsylvania ruled that Uber drivers (in this specific case, those offering an Uber Black service) are not employees of the company. The Court based its decision on the drivers\u2019 wide range of expressions of autonomy: (i) the absence of control by Uber\u2019s over the driver\u2019s activities; (ii) the drivers\u2019 ability to earn profits or incur losses; (iii) that drivers must buy or rent a vehicle to carry out the transportation service that meets the criteria of an Uber Black service; (iv) the \u201cimpermanence\u201d of the relationship between Uber and the driver, since its duration - or even its existence - is decided by the driver.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/23-Razak-v.-Uber-Techs.-Inc.-CIVIL-ACTION-NO.-16-573-_-Casetext-Search-Citator.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (23) Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-573 _ Casetext Search + Citator.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-6dc41af4-80e6-4262-bbd4-90cdf86afb6f\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/23-Razak-v.-Uber-Techs.-Inc.-CIVIL-ACTION-NO.-16-573-_-Casetext-Search-Citator.pdf\">(23) Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-573 _ Casetext Search + Citator<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/23-Razak-v.-Uber-Techs.-Inc.-CIVIL-ACTION-NO.-16-573-_-Casetext-Search-Citator.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-6dc41af4-80e6-4262-bbd4-90cdf86afb6f\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132-1024x683.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1419 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132-1024x683.png 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/primer-plano-joven-conducir-coche_3434560.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=13&amp;position=48&amp;uuid=4418e16d-874e-4cdb-bfd5-22ee0fb82cd9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa&nbsp;\u201cRazak v. Uber Techs., Inc.\u201d,&nbsp;del 11\/04\/2018, la Corte de distrito de Pensilvania, resolvi\u00f3 que los conductores de Uber (en el caso espec\u00edfico, del producto Uber Black) no son empleados de la compa\u00f1\u00eda, al descubrir en ellos un amplio [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[30,5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84],"class_list":["post-460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-a-trabajar","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=460"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3334,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/460\/revisions\/3334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}