{"id":458,"date":"2024-06-03T12:37:14","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:37:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=458"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:20:10","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:20:10","slug":"la-relacion-entre-uber-y-los-socios-conductores-no-es-de-tipo-laboral","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-los-socios-conductores-no-es-de-tipo-laboral\/","title":{"rendered":"The Relationship Between Uber And Uber Driver Is Not Of An Employment Nature"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 28th of September, 2017, in the complaint brought by&nbsp;<em>Hugo Humberto Ospina Agudelo &#8211; Presidente de la Asociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios y Conductores de Taxi&nbsp;<\/em>against&nbsp;<em>Uber Colombia S.A.S.<\/em>, before the Colombian Ministry of Labour, the Coordinator resolved not to begin administrative sanctioning proceedings against Uber Colombia S.A.S. This decision was based on the fact that, on one side, the company fulfills its duties in paying all workers that have employment contracts. On the other hand, and regarding Uber drivers, it was affirmed that the drivers are not direct employees of the company and that the form of relationship with these people is not of an employment nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/24-Hugo-Humberto-Ospina-Agudelo-c_-Uber-Colombia-S.A.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (24) Hugo Humberto Ospina Agudelo c_ Uber Colombia S.A..\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-53106969-8c5b-4d02-9a31-d0dbc18e7291\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/24-Hugo-Humberto-Ospina-Agudelo-c_-Uber-Colombia-S.A.pdf\">(24) Hugo Humberto Ospina Agudelo c_ Uber Colombia S.A.<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/24-Hugo-Humberto-Ospina-Agudelo-c_-Uber-Colombia-S.A.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-53106969-8c5b-4d02-9a31-d0dbc18e7291\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1531 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/ilustracion-concepto-paseo-pedido_12516922.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=7&amp;position=46&amp;uuid=f9458071-cd12-40b0-8e88-9d1bb2240fde\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la queja presentada por&nbsp;Hugo Humberto Ospina Agudelo &#8211; Presidente de la Asociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios y Conductores de Taxi&nbsp;contra&nbsp;Uber Colombia S.A.S., del 28\/09\/2017, ante el Ministerio de Trabajo de Colombia, la Coordinadora resolvi\u00f3 no iniciar procedimiento administrativo sancionatorio contra la [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[30,5,19,23,21],"tags":[106,101,84],"class_list":["post-458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-a-trabajar","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=458"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3335,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458\/revisions\/3335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}