{"id":4257,"date":"2025-01-06T14:20:58","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T14:20:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4257"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:08:41","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:08:41","slug":"nuevo-sobreseimiento-de-ubermoto-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-e-inexistencia-de-autoridad-de-aplicacion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-sobreseimiento-de-ubermoto-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-e-inexistencia-de-autoridad-de-aplicacion\/","title":{"rendered":"New UberMoto Acquittal Due To Lack Of Regulation And Inexistence Of Enforcement Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 7th of November, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Sotelo Rub\u00e9n Antonio<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court, acquitted the defendant. The Court found that, although the Registry of Service Providers mentioned by Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 116 had been created, no Enforcement Authority had been created, nor had the ordinance been formally regulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Sotelo-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia sobreseimiento Sotelo (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-46f867ac-a637-43fc-a546-48d761222bd1\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Sotelo-1.pdf\">Sentencia sobreseimiento Sotelo (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Sotelo-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-46f867ac-a637-43fc-a546-48d761222bd1\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 07\/11\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 1, en la causa \u201cSotelo Rub\u00e9n Antonio\u201d, sobresey\u00f3 al imputado al valorar que, pese a encontrarse creado el registro de prestadores estipulado en la ordenanza XVI N\u00b0 116, no se cre\u00f3 la [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4257"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4260,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4257\/revisions\/4260"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}