{"id":4253,"date":"2025-01-06T14:16:45","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T14:16:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4253"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:10:36","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:10:36","slug":"otro-sobreseimiento-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-ubermoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-sobreseimiento-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-ubermoto\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Acquittal Due To Lack Of UberMoto Regulation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 7th of November, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Servian Tamara Soledad<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court issued another acquittal for an UberMoto driver. The Court pointed out that no authoritative entity had yet been established to inspect and ensure that network transportation companies and the services they provide comply with current legal and regulatory requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Servian-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia sobreseimiento Servi\u00e1n (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-1c9426bb-b2e8-4214-a988-2326f3a9f43e\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Servian-1.pdf\">Sentencia sobreseimiento Servi\u00e1n (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Servian-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-1c9426bb-b2e8-4214-a988-2326f3a9f43e\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 07\/11\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 1, en la causa \u201cServian Tamara Soledad\u201d, dict\u00f3 otro sobreseimiento a una chofer de UberMoto, ya que se\u00f1al\u00f3 que no se ha constituido a\u00fan la autoridad de aplicaci\u00f3n destinada a inspeccionar y [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4253"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4256,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4253\/revisions\/4256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}