{"id":4249,"date":"2025-01-06T14:14:13","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T14:14:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4249"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:12:09","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:12:09","slug":"desestimacion-de-un-acta-de-infraccion-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-la-actividad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/desestimacion-de-un-acta-de-infraccion-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-la-actividad\/","title":{"rendered":"Dismissal Of Infringement Report Due To Lack Of Regulation Over Activity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 12th of November, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Balbuena Walter Gustavo<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court dismissed an infringement report filed against an UberMoto driver. The Court held that since Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 116 had not yet been regulated, the act in question did not count as an infringement.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Balbuena-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia sobreseimiento Balbuena (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-f71ff80d-c421-48c0-b088-9337748b1ece\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Balbuena-1.pdf\">Sentencia sobreseimiento Balbuena (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Balbuena-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-f71ff80d-c421-48c0-b088-9337748b1ece\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 12\/11\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 1, en la causa \u201cBalbuena Walter Gustavo\u201d, desestim\u00f3 un Acta labrada a un conductor de UberMoto, ya que no se ha reglamentado a\u00fan la ordenanza XVI N\u00b0116, por lo que el hecho [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4249"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4249\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4252,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4249\/revisions\/4252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}