{"id":4198,"date":"2025-01-06T13:20:53","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T13:20:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4198"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:13:56","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:13:56","slug":"nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-chofer-de-ubermoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-chofer-de-ubermoto\/","title":{"rendered":"New UberMoto Driver Acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 2nd of October, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>M\u00fcckenheim Miguel Maximiliano<\/em>\u201d, the No. 2 Municipal Infractions Court dismissed another UberMoto driver on the grounds that motorcycles do not fall under the conventional definition of a vehicle intended to transport passengers or cargo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Muckeinhein-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia desestima acta M\u00fcckeinhein (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-a1ae7823-81a3-4802-bb69-c3512e031341\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Muckeinhein-1.pdf\">Sentencia desestima acta M\u00fcckeinhein (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Muckeinhein-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-a1ae7823-81a3-4802-bb69-c3512e031341\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 02\/10\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 2, en la causa \u201cM\u00fcckenheim Miguel Maximiliano\u201d, desestim\u00f3 a otro driver de UberMoto sosteniendo que las motocicletas, como tales, no se ajustan a la definici\u00f3n convencional de un veh\u00edculo destinado al transporte [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4198"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4201,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4198\/revisions\/4201"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}