{"id":4183,"date":"2025-01-03T12:26:06","date_gmt":"2025-01-03T12:26:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4183"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:14:14","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:14:14","slug":"nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-un-chofer-de-ubermoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-un-chofer-de-ubermoto\/","title":{"rendered":"New UberMoto Driver Acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 2nd of October, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Procacci Federico Emmanuel<\/em>\u201d, the No. 2 Municipal Infractions Court acquitted a driver upon considering that the act in question was not described as an infraction in existing regulation. Furthermore, it was considered that a motorcycle was not encompassed by the definition of a passenger, nor cargo, transportation vehicle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Procacci-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia desestima acta Procacci (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-66da4c6c-9968-4bee-b9d0-a720d3c9d937\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Procacci-1.pdf\">Sentencia desestima acta Procacci (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Procacci-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-66da4c6c-9968-4bee-b9d0-a720d3c9d937\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 02\/10\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 2, en la causa \u201cProcacci Federico Emmanuel\u201d, sobresey\u00f3 al imputado al estimar que el hecho constatado no est\u00e1 descrito como una infracci\u00f3n en la normativa vigente, y que una motocicleta, por su [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4183"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4183\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4186,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4183\/revisions\/4186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}