{"id":4168,"date":"2025-01-02T22:10:34","date_gmt":"2025-01-02T22:10:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4168"},"modified":"2025-01-02T22:10:35","modified_gmt":"2025-01-02T22:10:35","slug":"nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-otro-chofer-de-uberx","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-sobreseimiento-a-otro-chofer-de-uberx\/","title":{"rendered":"Another UberX Driver Acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 1st of October, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Ferreyra Oscar Manuel<\/em>\", the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court dismissed the infringement report filed against the defendant due to a lack of certainty regarding the act in question. It was not clear if it referred to a passenger transportation service used as a public service, or one used through electronic platforms, or simply passenger transportation in a private vehicle, which did not require authorisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Ferreyra-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia sobreseimiento Ferreyra (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-d9957721-5e04-43cc-b967-3aa5b6447781\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Ferreyra-1.pdf\">Sentencia sobreseimiento Ferreyra (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Ferreyra-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-d9957721-5e04-43cc-b967-3aa5b6447781\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 01\/10\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 1, en la causa \u201cFerreyra Oscar Manuel\u201d, desestim\u00f3 el acta de infracci\u00f3n labrada a nombre del imputado ante la falta de certeza sobre el hecho, ya que no estaba claro si se [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,16,23,140,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4168"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4168\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4171,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4168\/revisions\/4171"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}