{"id":416,"date":"2024-06-03T12:15:16","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T12:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=416"},"modified":"2024-08-15T23:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T23:00:00","slug":"nuevamente-se-resuelve-sobreseer-por-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-juzgado-municipal-de-faltas-n-1-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevamente-se-resuelve-sobreseer-por-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-juzgado-municipal-de-faltas-n-1-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Once Again A Dismissal Is Ruled Due to Atypicity of Conduct (Municipal Infractions Court No. 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<strong><em>Ramirez Sergio Carlos &#8211; Acta de infracci\u00f3n N\u00b0 124 s\/infrac. Art. 5 Inc. M &#8211; ORD. XVI &#8211; N2 17 D.M.<\/em><\/strong>\u201d, the Judge ruled to dismiss considering that: (i) the conduct was not classified as an offence in any previous ordinance prior to the event; (ii) no other ordinance may be applied by analogy; (iii) regulations cannot be broadly interpreted to the detriment of the defendant; (iv) in all cases, doubt must be resolved in favour of the accused; (v) no regulation has been issued that determines the authorization required for the operators of passenger transportation services through digital platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7-Sentencia-Ramirez.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (7) Sentencia Ramirez.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-8360e34f-851a-4f79-b393-ae42ac3c8c4c\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7-Sentencia-Ramirez.pdf\">(7) Sentencia Ramirez<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7-Sentencia-Ramirez.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-8360e34f-851a-4f79-b393-ae42ac3c8c4c\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-134-1024x683.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1427 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-134-1024x683.png 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-134-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-134-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-134.png 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/fondo-elementos-abogacia_2250042.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=7&amp;position=47&amp;uuid=961bfd39-cfd5-4c54-a488-b716cd17f48a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cRamirez Sergio Carlos &#8211; Acta de infracci\u00f3n N\u00b0 124 s\/infrac. Art. 5 Inc. M &#8211; ORD. XVI &#8211; N2 17 D.M.\u201d, el juez resuelve sobreseer considerando que: i) no est\u00e1 tipificada la conducta en ordenanza previa al [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,16,23,21],"tags":[99,84,87],"class_list":["post-416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","tag-legalidad","tag-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3405,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions\/3405"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}