{"id":4152,"date":"2025-01-02T21:41:41","date_gmt":"2025-01-02T21:41:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4152"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:15:22","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:15:22","slug":"desestimacion-de-un-acta-de-infraccion-por-atipicidad-de-la-conducta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/desestimacion-de-un-acta-de-infraccion-por-atipicidad-de-la-conducta\/","title":{"rendered":"Dismissal Of Infringement Report Due To Atypicity Of Conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 25th of September, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Rodr\u00edguez Mar\u00eda Elizabet<\/em>\u201d, the No. 2 Municipal Infractions Court acquitted an UberMoto driver. The Court considered that a motorcycle does not fall under the conventional definition of a passenger, nor cargo, transportation vehicle. Therefore, the characteristics required to sanction were not met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Rodriguez-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia desestima acta Rodriguez (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-39882df5-a235-4979-9c9f-6e710fc1847c\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Rodriguez-1.pdf\">Sentencia desestima acta Rodriguez (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Rodriguez-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-39882df5-a235-4979-9c9f-6e710fc1847c\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 25\/09\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 2, en la causa \u201cRodr\u00edguez Mar\u00eda Elizabet\u201d, sobresey\u00f3 a una conductora de UberMoto al valorar que la motocicleta no se ajusta a la definici\u00f3n convencional no se ajusta a la definici\u00f3n convencional [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4152"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4152\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4155,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4152\/revisions\/4155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}