{"id":392,"date":"2024-06-03T11:59:22","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:59:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=392"},"modified":"2024-08-15T23:12:39","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T23:12:39","slug":"es-constitucional-regular-a-uber-y-a-los-taxis-de-manera-diferenciada-suprema-corte-de-mendoza","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-constitucional-regular-a-uber-y-a-los-taxis-de-manera-diferenciada-suprema-corte-de-mendoza\/","title":{"rendered":"It Is Constitutional To Regulate Uber And Taxis In Different Ways (Supreme Court of Mendoza)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Asociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios de Taxi de Mendoza &#8211; APROTAM c\/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza p\/ acci\u00f3n de inconstitucionalidad<\/em>\u201d, (CAU CUIJ N\u00b0 13-04410472-9), the Supreme Court of Mendoza rejected the claim of unconstitutionality filed by the Taxi Owners\u2019 Association of Mendoza against Mendoza\u2019s Provincial Mobility Law 9086 which regulates private transportation services via digital platforms. The Court held that lawmakers are able to regulate different services in different ways, and that doing so does not amount to unfair competition or a violation of the principle of equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/SCJMza-APROTAM.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of SCJMza - APROTAM.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-d07d831c-1c21-4188-8bf1-fb3a19cb79c0\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/SCJMza-APROTAM.pdf\">SCJMza &#8211; APROTAM<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/SCJMza-APROTAM.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-d07d831c-1c21-4188-8bf1-fb3a19cb79c0\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1280 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/matrimonio-ruptura-certificacion-divorcio_2767734.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=4&amp;position=17&amp;uuid=506998ff-c75b-4bc8-97e8-decc81a44535\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cAsociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios de Taxi de Mendoza &#8211; APROTAM c\/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza p\/ acci\u00f3n de inconstitucionalidad\u201d, (CAU CUIJ N\u00b0 13-04410472-9), 19\/05\/2022, la Suprema Corte de Mendoza rechaz\u00f3 la acci\u00f3n de inconstitucionalidad interpuesta por [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[24,5,14,23,25,21],"tags":[103,85,84,110,102,111],"class_list":["post-392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-mendoza","category-legalidad","category-servicio-de-transporte-privado-regulado-en-el-cccn","category-temas","tag-competencia-desleal","tag-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-revolucion-tecnologica","tag-servicio-de-transporte-privado-regulado-en-el-cccn"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=392"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3415,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392\/revisions\/3415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}