{"id":382,"date":"2024-06-03T11:55:37","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:55:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=382"},"modified":"2024-08-15T23:18:42","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T23:18:42","slug":"otra-vez-mas-se-resuelve-que-las-actas-de-infraccion-no-son-prueba-suficiente-para-condenar-a-un-conductor-juzgado-en-lo-correccional-mar-del-plata","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-mas-se-resuelve-que-las-actas-de-infraccion-no-son-prueba-suficiente-para-condenar-a-un-conductor-juzgado-en-lo-correccional-mar-del-plata\/","title":{"rendered":"Once Again It Is Ruled That Infringement Reports Are Not Sufficient Evidence To Convict A Driver (Criminal Court Mar del Plata)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Gaggia Nicolas s\/ apelaci\u00f3n contravenci\u00f3n de tr\u00e1nsito<\/em>\u201d, (causa N\u00b011065), the Court annulled the fine imposed on a driver for transporting people without municipal authority. To reach this decision, the Court examined the actions of the Infractions Court, which had failed to comply with the request to produce evidentiary measures, despite the driver denying the presence of any passenger. The Court decided that the rules of due legal process had not been adhered to. Lacking sufficient evidence, the Court declared that it was impossible to determine with sufficient certainty how the events took place to warrant a conviction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/3-ABSOLUCION-CORRECCIONAL-DE-GAGGIA.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (3) ABSOLUCION CORRECCIONAL DE GAGGIA.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-addc7d18-0afd-476a-9b26-00d9495dd869\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/3-ABSOLUCION-CORRECCIONAL-DE-GAGGIA.pdf\">(3) ABSOLUCION CORRECCIONAL DE GAGGIA<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/3-ABSOLUCION-CORRECCIONAL-DE-GAGGIA.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-addc7d18-0afd-476a-9b26-00d9495dd869\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-60-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1196 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-60-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-60-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-60-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-60.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/ilustracion-concepto-multa-trafico_209087731.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=2&amp;position=25&amp;uuid=17d50d22-0e0d-4234-b27a-412dd4ea1ce0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cGaggia Nicolas s\/ apelaci\u00f3n contravenci\u00f3n de tr\u00e1nsito\u201d , (causa N\u00b011065), 12\/12\/2022 el Juzgado dej\u00f3 sin efecto la multa impuesta al conductor por transportar personas sin autorizaci\u00f3n municipal. Para as\u00ed decidir, examin\u00f3 la actuaci\u00f3n del Juzgado de Faltas [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,12],"tags":[86,94,89],"class_list":["post-382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-mar-del-plata","tag-absolucion","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-omision-de-produccion-de-prueba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3425,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions\/3425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}