{"id":3778,"date":"2024-10-25T19:45:07","date_gmt":"2024-10-25T19:45:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=3778"},"modified":"2024-11-13T20:39:14","modified_gmt":"2024-11-13T20:39:14","slug":"la-justicia-de-tierra-del-fuego-sobreseyo-a-otro-driver-y-ordeno-acatar-en-lo-sucesivo-el-precedente-quisbert-donde-se-afirma-la-legalidad-de-uber","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-de-tierra-del-fuego-sobreseyo-a-otro-driver-y-ordeno-acatar-en-lo-sucesivo-el-precedente-quisbert-donde-se-afirma-la-legalidad-de-uber\/","title":{"rendered":"Tierra del Fuego Court Acquitted Another Driver And Ordered Future Proceedings To Comply With Precedent Set In \u201cQuisbert\u201d Case, In Which Uber\u2019s Legality Is Confirmed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 14th of August, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Martinez, Leonardo Alberto s\/ Recurso De Apelacion Art. 23 Inc. 5 C.P<\/em>, Expte. 5772\/2024, the Criminal Court of the Northern Judicial District of Tierra del Fuego Province acquitted the defendant, recalling that the Court had already ruled in favour of the defendant in the precedent \u201c<em>Quisbert Alejandro Javier s\/Recurso de apelaci\u00f3n art. 23 inc. 5 CP<\/em>\u201d, Expte. 5635\/2023. Reiterating this precedent, the Court confirmed the legality of Uber and held that Ordinance 3548\/2016, which prohibited the provision of passenger transportation services through mobile apps, violated the right to work, the right to exercise lawful business, the freedom of contractual association, the principle of rationality in regulation, and legal equality.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this regard, the Court ordered that the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court bear in mind that future decisions should follow the precedent set in the \u201cQuisbert\u201d case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Martinez-Leonardo-Rio-Grande.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Mart\u00ednez Leonardo - R\u00edo Grande.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-966de956-8d12-45eb-87eb-df20cc837ff0\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Martinez-Leonardo-Rio-Grande.pdf\">Mart\u00ednez Leonardo &#8211; R\u00edo Grande<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Martinez-Leonardo-Rio-Grande.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-966de956-8d12-45eb-87eb-df20cc837ff0\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the 14th of October, 2024, in the case \u201cMartinez, Leonardo Alberto s\/ Recurso De Apelacion Art. 23 Inc. 5 C.P.\u201d, Expte. 5772\/2024, the Criminal Court of the Northern Judicial District of Tierra del Fuego Province acquitted the defendant, recalling that the Court had already ruled in favour of the defendant in the precedent [...]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[131,123],"tags":[92,106,96,105,107,84,110,87],"class_list":["post-3778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia-de-rio-grande","category-novedades","tag-control-judicial-suficiente","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-derecho-de-acceso-a-la-justicia","tag-derecho-de-los-consumidores","tag-economia-colaborativa","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3778"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3981,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778\/revisions\/3981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}