{"id":376,"date":"2024-06-03T11:54:02","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:54:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=376"},"modified":"2024-08-15T23:19:55","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T23:19:55","slug":"se-absuelve-a-un-conductor-por-transportar-personas-sin-autorizacion-municipal-por-falta-de-prueba-juzgado-en-lo-correccional-mar-del-plata","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-absuelve-a-un-conductor-por-transportar-personas-sin-autorizacion-municipal-por-falta-de-prueba-juzgado-en-lo-correccional-mar-del-plata\/","title":{"rendered":"Driver Acquitted For Transporting People \u201cWithout Municipal Authorization\u201d Due To Lack Of Evidence (Criminal Court Mar del Plata)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Mendoza anibal s\/apelaci\u00f3n falta municipal<\/em>\u201d, (causa N\u00b035921), the Court acquitted the defendant, annulling the fine he had been dealt for transporting passengers without municipal authorization. The Court held that the distinction between a genuine witness and entrapment agent could have been resolved if, at the appropriate time, evidence had been presented, such as a screenshot from Uber showing the service request and corresponding driver acceptance. In its absence, the evidentiary value of the legal instrument upon which the defendant\u2019s conduct was based was diminished, leading to his acquittal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SENTENCIA-ABSOLUTORIA-MENDOZA.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (6) SENTENCIA ABSOLUTORIA MENDOZA.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-931230b0-c2c3-4908-aa97-fe5a65721b62\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SENTENCIA-ABSOLUTORIA-MENDOZA.pdf\">(6) SENTENCIA ABSOLUTORIA MENDOZA<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/6-SENTENCIA-ABSOLUTORIA-MENDOZA.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-931230b0-c2c3-4908-aa97-fe5a65721b62\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-73-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1209 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-73-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-73-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-73-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-73.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/grafico-derecho-justicia-legal_5405132.htm#query=multa&amp;position=4&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=sph\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cMendoza anibal s\/apelaci\u00f3n falta municipal\u201d, (causa N\u00b035921), 18\/11\/2022, la C\u00e1mara absolvi\u00f3 al imputado, dejando sin efecto la multa con que hab\u00eda sido sancionado por transportar personas sin autorizaci\u00f3n municipal. El Tribunal consider\u00f3 que la calidad de testigo [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,12],"tags":[86,94,89],"class_list":["post-376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-mar-del-plata","tag-absolucion","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-omision-de-produccion-de-prueba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3428,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions\/3428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}