{"id":320,"date":"2024-06-03T11:22:44","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:22:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=320"},"modified":"2024-08-16T03:42:57","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T03:42:57","slug":"la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/","title":{"rendered":"CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving User The Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Gutierrez Aguilar, Raelzo Jos\u00e9 sobre 6.1.47- Requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros<\/em>\u201d, (CAU 904\/2020-0), No. 8 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver of the charge of operating without the authorization stipulated in Article 6.1.94 of CABA\u2019s Transportation Code. The Code states that penalties for taxi, remis (private taxi), school, and unauthorized services are explicitly enumerated, whereas the mention of \u201cother services\u201d is vague and fails to clearly define which activities are encompassed by this term. This lack of specificity violates the principles of strict enumeration and legality in sanctioning matters, the prohibition of analogies, and the requirement that laws must be interpreted restrictively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Gutierrez-Aguilar-15-05-2.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (8) Gutie\u0301rrez Aguilar 15-05-2.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-2d2e893c-803d-454b-81cb-5ef953448377\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Gutierrez-Aguilar-15-05-2.pdf\">(8) Gutie\u0301rrez Aguilar 15-05-2<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/8-Gutierrez-Aguilar-15-05-2.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-2d2e893c-803d-454b-81cb-5ef953448377\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1272 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/sistema-navegacion-gps-telefono-automovil-autonomo_13461099.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=14&amp;position=42&amp;uuid=6d8231db-e0c5-455b-89e8-d07c2e737731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cGutierrez Aguilar, Raelzo Jos\u00e9 sobre 6.1.47- Requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 904\/2020-0), 15\/05\/2020, el Juzgado PCyF 28 absolvi\u00f3 al conductor de la acusaci\u00f3n de conducir sin habilitaci\u00f3n conforme dispone el art. 6.1.94 del [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[24,5,6,23,21],"tags":[86,94,99,85,84],"class_list":["post-320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-caba","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-absolucion","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","tag-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","tag-legalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=320"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3463,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/320\/revisions\/3463"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}