{"id":310,"date":"2024-06-03T11:20:00","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=310"},"modified":"2024-08-16T03:45:48","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T03:45:48","slug":"se-vuelve-a-recordar-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-vuelve-a-recordar-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/","title":{"rendered":"It Is Reiterated That, Without Passenger Identification, There Can Be No Conviction for Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Hussen Miriam Fabiana sobre 6.1.44 &#8211; Transporte de pasajeros<\/em>\u201d, (CAU 20815\/2019), the First Chamber revoked the initial ruling that charged a driver for providing passenger transportation services without authorization. This new ruling was given since the infringement report did not identify the passenger, an essential requirement for the existence of transportation activity. Furthermore, it was indicated that that omission violated the defendant\u2019s right to a fair trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/13-SENTENCIA-HUSSEN-SALA1-1-9-2.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (13) SENTENCIA HUSSEN SALA1-1-9-2.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-f683eef4-86a6-49bf-8b03-1bc91806d325\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/13-SENTENCIA-HUSSEN-SALA1-1-9-2.pdf\">(13) SENTENCIA HUSSEN SALA1-1-9-2<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/13-SENTENCIA-HUSSEN-SALA1-1-9-2.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-f683eef4-86a6-49bf-8b03-1bc91806d325\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1188 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/primer-dedo-apuntando-pantalla-telefono_5287173.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=1&amp;position=1&amp;uuid=8bcedcf7-5b5d-47ef-95e2-840631927830\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cHussen Miriam Fabiana sobre 6.1.44 &#8211; Transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 20815\/2019), 8\/11\/2019 la Sala I revoc\u00f3 la sentencia de primera instancia que conden\u00f3 a la conductora por prestar el servicio de transporte de pasajeros sin habilitaci\u00f3n, dado [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,6],"tags":[86,94,89],"class_list":["post-310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-caba","tag-absolucion","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-omision-de-produccion-de-prueba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3469,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions\/3469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}