{"id":306,"date":"2024-06-03T11:18:58","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:18:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=306"},"modified":"2024-08-16T03:46:33","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T03:46:33","slug":"otra-vez-se-declara-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-se-declara-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/","title":{"rendered":"Once Again It Is Ruled That, Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Maciel, Oscar sobre 6.1.47 &#8211; Requisitos de los Veh\u00edculos de Transporte de Pasajeros<\/em>\u201d, (CAU 38237\/2019), the First Chamber revoked the initial ruling that charged a driver for providing passenger transportation services without authorization. This new ruling was given since the infringement report did not identify the passenger, an essential requirement for the existence of transportation activity. Furthermore, it was indicated that that omission violated the defendant\u2019s right to a fair trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/15-SALA-I-AUSENCIA-DE-PASAJERO-MACIEL-OSCAR-3-10-2.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of (15) SALA I AUSENCIA DE PASAJERO MACIEL OSCAR-3-10-2.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-a2dfc9cc-51ab-4b4d-b88c-a7d66de80b64\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/15-SALA-I-AUSENCIA-DE-PASAJERO-MACIEL-OSCAR-3-10-2.pdf\">(15) SALA I AUSENCIA DE PASAJERO MACIEL OSCAR-3-10-2<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/15-SALA-I-AUSENCIA-DE-PASAJERO-MACIEL-OSCAR-3-10-2.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-a2dfc9cc-51ab-4b4d-b88c-a7d66de80b64\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1171 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/mujer-que-desea-pagar-servicios-taxi_19966533.htm#from_view=detail_alsolike\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cMaciel, Oscar sobre 6.1.47 &#8211; Requisitos de los Veh\u00edculos de Transporte de Pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 38237\/2019, la Sala I revoc\u00f3 la sentencia de primera instancia que conden\u00f3 a la conductora por prestar el servicio de transporte de pasajeros [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,6],"tags":[86,94,89],"class_list":["post-306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-caba","tag-absolucion","tag-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-en-juicio","tag-omision-de-produccion-de-prueba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=306"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3472,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions\/3472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}