{"id":292,"date":"2024-06-03T11:15:08","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:15:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=292"},"modified":"2024-08-16T03:34:16","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T03:34:16","slug":"la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/","title":{"rendered":"Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 2nd of July, 2020, in the case<em>&nbsp;\u201cSindicato de peones de taxis de la capital federal y otros contra ministro de desarrollo urbano y transporte y otros sobre otras demandas contra autoridad administrativa &#8211; gen\u00e9rico\u201d<\/em>, (File No. 3065\/2016-0), the representative for the Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services for CABA held that, as stipulated by Article 138 of CABA\u2019s Constitution, the Regulatory Body exercises control of the quality of public services. Therefore, it lacks jurisdiction to act in this case since the activity carried out by UBER does not qualify as a public service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contestacion-de-oficio-EURSPCABA.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Contestacion de oficio EURSPCABA.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-0779abb3-3311-4175-a950-9b873cc2a8c3\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contestacion-de-oficio-EURSPCABA.pdf\">Contestacion de oficio EURSPCABA<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Contestacion-de-oficio-EURSPCABA.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-0779abb3-3311-4175-a950-9b873cc2a8c3\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1199 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/vector-gratis\/ilustracion-concepto-fiscal_28900551.htm#query=incompetencia%20juez&amp;position=2&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=ais\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En el marco de la causa&nbsp;\u201cSindicato de peones de taxis de la capital federal y otros contra ministro de desarrollo urbano y transporte y otros sobre otras demandas contra autoridad administrativa &#8211; gen\u00e9rico\u201d, (Expte. N\u00b0 3065\/2016-0), 02\/07\/2020, el apoderado del [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[24,5,6,23,26,21],"tags":[86,85,84,110],"class_list":["post-292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-de-caba","category-legalidad","category-plataforma-de-intermediacion","category-temas","tag-absolucion","tag-diferencias-con-el-taxi-y-el-remis","tag-legalidad","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3446,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions\/3446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}