{"id":278,"date":"2024-06-03T11:06:49","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:06:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=278"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:13:34","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:13:34","slug":"uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Kalanik, T. &nbsp;s\/entorpecimiento de servicios<\/em>, (CAU N\u00b0 29155\/16), in proceedings before the No. 13 National Criminal Court of Preliminary Investigation, the complaint that accused Uber of obstruction of traffic, unlawful association, instigation of criminal offences, unfair competition, and disobedience was dismissed. The Court held that Uber provides a lawful, commercial activity, which does not constitute an unlawful association, and that offering passenger transportation without official authorization does not amount to a criminal offence under the Penal Code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/1.-Kalanik.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of 1. Kalanik.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-25d8cb4e-1802-4c93-a071-4fece515101a\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/1.-Kalanik.pdf\">1. Kalanik<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/1.-Kalanik.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-25d8cb4e-1802-4c93-a071-4fece515101a\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1189 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/atasco-trafico-lleno-gente-carretera_16497169.htm#query=uber&amp;position=18&amp;from_view=search&amp;track=sph&amp;uuid=2964cc15-e03c-496d-b649-74b341f65564\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cKalanik, T. &nbsp;s\/entorpecimiento de servicios\u201d, (CAU N\u00b0 29155\/16), 01\/08\/2016, en tr\u00e1mite ante el Juzgado Nacional de Instrucci\u00f3n en lo Criminal N\u00b0 13, se desestim\u00f3 la denuncia que acusaba a Uber por entorpecimiento del tr\u00e1nsito, asociaci\u00f3n il\u00edcita, instigaci\u00f3n [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,11,23,21],"tags":[99,103,84,100],"class_list":["post-278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-nacional-y-federal","category-legalidad","category-temas","tag-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","tag-competencia-desleal","tag-legalidad","tag-razonabilidad-y-proporcionalidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3326,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278\/revisions\/3326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}