{"id":266,"date":"2024-06-03T11:02:34","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T11:02:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=266"},"modified":"2024-08-15T20:17:21","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T20:17:21","slug":"uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 8th of May, 2019, in the case \u201c<em>Uber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s\/INF. LEY 24.769<\/em>\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627\/2016), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants of their charges of aggravated tax evasion and money laundering. In reaching this decision, the Court accepted the Public Prosecutor\u2019s judgement, which affirmed that there is no employment relationship between Uber and the drivers and, for that reason, employment regulations do not apply to the company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7.-Uber-Argentina-S.R.L.-Y-OTROS-s_INF.-LEY-24.769-Expte-No-8627_2016.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of 7. \u201cUber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s_INF. LEY 24.769\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627_2016).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-5f222ff8-0a34-45f5-bc29-a79b9c288cb6\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7.-Uber-Argentina-S.R.L.-Y-OTROS-s_INF.-LEY-24.769-Expte-No-8627_2016.pdf\">7. \u201cUber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s_INF. LEY 24.769\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627_2016)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/7.-Uber-Argentina-S.R.L.-Y-OTROS-s_INF.-LEY-24.769-Expte-No-8627_2016.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-5f222ff8-0a34-45f5-bc29-a79b9c288cb6\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:60px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-vertically-aligned-center has-background\" style=\"background-color:#f9f9f9;grid-template-columns:15% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1298 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.freepik.es\/foto-gratis\/retrato-mujer-morena-su-coche_13919473.htm#fromView=search&amp;page=2&amp;position=8&amp;uuid=fcfeebd6-1b8e-4189-9cbf-40a4a2a70c05\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&#8211; Cr\u00e9ditos de imagen utilizada<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En la causa \u201cUber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s\/INF. LEY 24.769\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627\/2016), 26\/02\/2021, el Juzgado hizo lugar a la excepci\u00f3n por falta de acci\u00f3n, sobreseyendo a los imputados por los delitos de evasi\u00f3n tributaria, estafa y lavado de [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[30,5,11,26,21],"tags":[99,106,101,104,110,87],"class_list":["post-266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-derecho-a-trabajar","category-jurisprudencia","category-jurisprudencia-nacional-y-federal","category-plataforma-de-intermediacion","category-temas","tag-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","tag-derecho-a-trabajar","tag-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral","tag-legalidad-tributaria","tag-plataforma-de-intermediacion","tag-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3332,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266\/revisions\/3332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}