{"id":3655,"date":"2024-10-25T15:42:07","date_gmt":"2024-10-25T15:42:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?page_id=3655"},"modified":"2025-05-12T15:55:21","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:55:21","slug":"ciudad-autonoma-de-buenos-aires","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/ciudad-autonoma-de-buenos-aires\/","title":{"rendered":"City of Buenos Aires"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 160px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"wpb_text_column wpb_content_element\" >\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\">City of Buenos Aires<\/h5>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"edge-blog-list-holder edge-bl-standard edge-bl-four-columns edge-bl-normal-space edge-bl-pag-no-pagination\"  data-type=\"standard\" data-number-of-posts=\"40\" data-number-of-columns=\"4\" data-space-between-columns=\"normal\" data-category=\"jurisprudencia-de-caba\" data-order-by=\"date\" data-order=\"ASC\" data-image-size=\"landscape\" data-title-tag=\"h4\" data-excerpt-length=\"30\" data-post-info-section=\"no\" data-post-info-image=\"yes\" data-post-info-author=\"yes\" data-post-info-date=\"no\" data-post-info-category=\"yes\" data-post-info-comments=\"no\" data-post-info-like=\"no\" data-post-info-share=\"no\" data-pagination-type=\"no-pagination\" data-max-num-pages=\"1\" data-next-page=\"2\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bl-wrapper\">\n\t\t<ul class=\"edge-blog-list\">\n\t\t\t<li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-90.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty\">\n            Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 4th of September, 2023, in the case \u201cMejia Silva, Luis David sobre 6.1.47  \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (case No. 108976\/2023), the First Instance Court No. 13 in Criminal, Infractions, and Regulatory Matters declared null the proceedings\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-29.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent\">\n            Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of November, 2017, in the case \u201cMarquez, Jose Bonifacio s\/art. 1472:83 \u2013 Usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/ fines lucrativos\u201d, (case No. 258505\/2017), the proceedings were declared null for\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-91.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null\">\n            Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 30th of March, 2022, in the case \u201cCrocci, Albano sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 26630\/2022-0), all proceedings at the administrative stage were declared null because\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-93.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence\">\n            Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of October, 2019, in the case \u201cOjeda Eduardo Juan sobre 6.1.44 transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 39237\/2019-0), the Court acquitted the defendant and declared null the administrative ruling\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" title=\"Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-96.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" title=\"Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over\">\n            Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 6th of December, 2019, in the case \u201cIncidente de requerimiento a juicio en autos: Uber, Uber y otros sobre 1\u00b0 ley 26.735 \u2013 art. 1\u00b0- evasi\u00f3n simple. ley 26.735 (modificaci\u00f3n ley 24.769)\u201d, (Expte. INC 15712\/2016-10), the City of Buenos Aires initiated\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" title=\"Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-59.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" title=\"Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details\">\n            Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of March, 2021, in the case \u201cQuisbert Choque, David Fernando sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 3859\/2020-0), the Court acquitted the defendant\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" title=\"Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" title=\"Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)\">\n            Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of July, 2020, in the case \u201cSindicato de peones de taxis de la capital federal y otros contra ministro de desarrollo urbano y transporte y otros sobre otras demandas contra autoridad administrativa \u2013 gen\u00e9rico\u201d, (File No. 3065\/2016-0), the representative for the Sole\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-58.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cUber y otros sobre 83 -Usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/fines lucrativos (no autorizados)\u201d, (File No. 17480\/19), the Court upheld the ruling of Chamber II of the Criminal\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-62.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 10th of February, 2021, in the case \u201cSajoux, Nicol\u00e1s y otros s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Nicol\u00e1s Sajoux (UBER) s\/ infr. art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/ fines lucrativos (no autorizadas)\u2019\u201d, (File No, 15859\/18), the Court acquitted\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-76.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of August, 2019, in the case \u201cUBER s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Incidente de apelaci\u00f3n en autos: UBER y otros s\/ art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-92.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 18th of June, 2018, in the case \u201cNN (UBER) s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Incidente de apelaci\u00f3n por clausura\/bloqueo de p\u00e1gina web en todo el pa\u00eds en autos: NN\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-95.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 27th September, 2022, in the case \u201cIncidente de apelaci\u00f3n en autos Perez Ramos, Miguel Angel sobre 6.1.44 \u2013 Transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (INC 136886\/2021-1), the Second Chamber revoked the initial\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-94.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 29th of March. 2021, in the case \u201cYacuzzi, Javier Pablo sobre  6.1.47 \u2013 Requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 46571\/2019-0), the First Chamber revoked\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-se-declara-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That, Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-35.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-se-declara-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That, Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Once Again It Is Ruled That, Without Passenger Identification, There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cMaciel, Oscar sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 Requisitos de los Veh\u00edculos de Transporte de Pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 38237\/2019), the First Chamber revoked the initial ruling that charged a driver for providing passenger transportation services without\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-vez-se-declara-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Ruled That Without Passenger Identification There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-87.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Ruled That Without Passenger Identification There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            It Is Ruled That Without Passenger Identification There Cannot Be A Conviction For Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 3rd of December, 2019, in the case \u201cMercedes Cano, Yan Carlos Alberto sobre 4.1.7- taxis, transportes escolares y remises sin autorizaci\u00f3n\u201d, (CAU 19291\/2019-0), the First Chamber revoked the initial ruling that charged a driver for providing passenger transportation\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-vuelve-a-recordar-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Reiterated That, Without Passenger Identification, There Can Be No Conviction for Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-52.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-vuelve-a-recordar-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Reiterated That, Without Passenger Identification, There Can Be No Conviction for Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            It Is Reiterated That, Without Passenger Identification, There Can Be No Conviction for Providing A Transportation Service \u201cWithout Authorization\u201d (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of November, 2019, in the case \u201cHussen Miriam Fabiana sobre 6.1.44 \u2013 Transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 20815\/2019), the First Chamber revoked the initial ruling that charged a driver\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-vuelve-a-recordar-que-sin-identificacion-de-pasajeros-no-puede-haber-condena-por-prestar-una-actividad-de-transporte-sin-habilitacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-37.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of May, 2020, in the case \u201cLedesma, Alejandro Jos\u00e9 sobre 6.1.47- requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 55700\/2019-0),No. 9 Criminal and Infractions Court declared the proceedings null for not complying with the\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/por-segunda-vez-se-determina-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"For The Second Time, It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-46.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/por-segunda-vez-se-determina-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"For The Second Time, It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            For The Second Time, It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of October, 2019, in the case \u201cBrozzoni, Hugo Argentino sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 38431\/2019-0), No. 13 Criminal and Infractions Court declared the proceedings null for not complying with the procedural\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/por-segunda-vez-se-determina-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-resuelve-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-99.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-resuelve-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Once Again It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 23rd of October, 2019, in the case \u201cScianca, Mariano Horacio sobre 6.1.47- requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 39814\/2019-0), No. 15 Criminal and Infractions Court declared the proceedings null for not complying with the procedural requirements\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-resuelve-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-97.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            It Is Ruled That The GCBA Cannot Withhold Uber Drivers\u2019 Licences (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of October, 2019, in the case \u201cGranados Meneses, Miguel Angel sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 38510\/2019-0), No. 15 Criminal and Infractions Court declared the proceedings null for not complying with\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-el-gcba-no-puede-retener-licencias-de-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving User The Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-98.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving User The Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving User The Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of May, 2020, in the case \u201cGutierrez Aguilar, Raelzo Jos\u00e9 sobre 6.1.47- Requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 904\/2020-0), No. 8 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver of the charge of operating without the authorization\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-precedente-que-determina-que-la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A New Precedent Determines That CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving Using the Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-100.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-precedente-que-determina-que-la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A New Precedent Determines That CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving Using the Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            A New Precedent Determines That CABA\u2019s \u201cAnti-Uber Law\u201d Does Not Prohibit Driving Using the Application Uber (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of May, 2020, in the case \u201cFaccio, Marcelo Ra\u00fal sobre 6.1.47- requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 2224\/2020-0), No. 28 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nuevo-precedente-que-determina-que-la-ley-anti-uber-de-la-caba-no-prohibe-conducir-utilizando-la-aplicacion-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quinto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Fifth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-89.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quinto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Fifth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            A Fifth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 27th of November, 2018, in the case \u201cCorrales, Jonathan Facundo sobre 6.1.4 \u2013 Categor\u00eda de licencia para conducir\u201d, (CAU 26217\/2018-0), No. 14 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver. This ruling was based\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quinto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/cuarto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Fourth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-1.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/cuarto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Fourth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            A Fourth Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of November, 2018, in the case \u201cBellini Marco, Alfredo sobre 6.1.49 bis \u2013 Prestaci\u00f3n de servicio p\u00fablico de taxis sin habilitaci\u00f3n\u201d, (CAU 27617\/2018), No. 7 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver.This ruling was\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/cuarto-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tercer-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Third Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-88.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tercer-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Third Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            A Third Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of November, 2018, in the case \u201cGimeno, Jacinto An\u00edbal sobre 6.1.53 \u2013 Estacionamiento medido\u201d, (CAU 25862\/2018), No. 7 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted the driver. This ruling was based on the understanding that: (i) there is no specific regulation\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tercer-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/segundo-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Second Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-4.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/segundo-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"A Second Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            A Second Precedent Determines That Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 23rd of November, 2021, in the case \u201cL\u00f3pez, Roxana Edith sobre 4.1.22- Exhibici\u00f3n de documentaci\u00f3n obligatoria\u201d, (CAU 7384\/2020-0), No. 7 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted a driver. This ruling was based\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/segundo-precedente-que-determina-que-conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-5.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Driving Using Uber Is Perfectly Legal (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 25th June, 2019, in the case \u201cYovino, Augusto sobre 6.1.49 \u2013 Requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de carga y de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 3107\/2019-0), No. 7 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted an Uber driver. This ruling was based on the understanding that: (i) there is no specific\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-es-perfectamente-legal-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quien-conduce-utilizando-uber-no-presta-un-servicio-de-remis-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Those Who Drive Using Uber Are Not Providing a Remis (Private Taxi) Service (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-2.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quien-conduce-utilizando-uber-no-presta-un-servicio-de-remis-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Those Who Drive Using Uber Are Not Providing a Remis (Private Taxi) Service (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Those Who Drive Using Uber Are Not Providing a Remis (Private Taxi) Service (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 3rd of February, 2017, in the case \u201cQuevedo, Cristian Damian s\/ Infracci\u00f3n art\u00edculo 6.1.52 de la Ley 451\u201d, (Expte. 11465\/2016), No. 31 Criminal and Infractions Court acquitted an Uber driver who had been dealt an\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/quien-conduce-utilizando-uber-no-presta-un-servicio-de-remis-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li>\t\t<\/ul>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 32px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"En la causa \u201cQuevedo, Cristian Damian s\/ Infracci\u00f3n art\u00edculo 6.1.52 de la Ley 451\u201d, (Expte. 11465\/2016), 03\/02\/2017, el Juzgado PCyF 31 absolvi\u00f3 al conductor a quien se le labr\u00f3 un acta por prestar servicio de rem\u00eds con licencia vencida, afirmando [...]","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-3655","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3655"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3822,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3655\/revisions\/3822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}