{"id":2112,"date":"2024-06-24T20:19:21","date_gmt":"2024-06-24T20:19:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?page_id=2112"},"modified":"2025-05-13T15:59:21","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T15:59:21","slug":"jurisprudencia-nacional-y-federal","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/jurisprudencia\/jurisprudencia-nacional-y-federal\/","title":{"rendered":"National &amp; Federal Jurisprudence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 160px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><div class=\"edge-blog-list-holder edge-bl-standard edge-bl-four-columns edge-bl-normal-space edge-bl-pag-load-more\"  data-type=\"standard\" data-number-of-posts=\"40\" data-number-of-columns=\"4\" data-space-between-columns=\"normal\" data-category=\"jurisprudencia-nacional-y-federal\" data-order-by=\"date\" data-order=\"ASC\" data-image-size=\"landscape\" data-title-tag=\"h4\" data-excerpt-length=\"30\" data-post-info-section=\"no\" data-post-info-image=\"yes\" data-post-info-author=\"yes\" data-post-info-date=\"no\" data-post-info-category=\"yes\" data-post-info-comments=\"no\" data-post-info-like=\"no\" data-post-info-share=\"no\" data-pagination-type=\"load-more\" data-max-num-pages=\"1\" data-next-page=\"2\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bl-wrapper\">\n\t\t<ul class=\"edge-blog-list\">\n\t\t\t<li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-50.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cUber S.R.L. Y OTROS S\/INFRACCI\u00d3N LEY 24.769\u201d, (CAU N\u00ba 1859\/2017), the Court upheld the Public Prosecutor\u2019s motion to dismiss the complaint, holding that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 26th of February, 2021, in the case \u201cUber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s\/INF. LEY 24.769\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627\/2016), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-111.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of November, 2022, in the case \u201cUber argentina s.r.l. y otros s\/inf. art .303\u2019\u2019, (CPE 648\/2021), the Court dismissed the money laundering accusation - at the request of the Public Prosecutor - on the grounds that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-107.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 26th of October, 2021, in the case \u201cUber Argentina SRL s\/infracci\u00f3n ley 24.760\u201d, (CPE 1838\/2016), the Court dismissed Uber on its alleged aggravated tax evasion regarding VAT and Income Tax.\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-108.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of December, 2020, in the case \u201cUber argentina s\/ inf. ley 24.769\u201d, (CPE 524\/2019\/2), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants of their charges\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" title=\"Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-85.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" title=\"Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)\">\n            Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 14th of August, 2018, in the case \u201cRecurso de hecho deducido por el Sindicato de Peones de Taxis de la Capital Federal en la causa Uber y otros s\/ incidente de recurso extraordinario\u201d,\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" title=\"It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-86.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" title=\"It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)\">\n            It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 3rd of November, 2016, in the case \u201cK., T. y otros\u201d, (CCC 29155\/2016\/CA1), the Chamber upheld the decision by the previous Court, recognising Uber\u2019s legality. It also added that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" title=\"Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" title=\"Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)\">\n            Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 1st of August, 2016, in the case \u201cKalanik, T.  s\/entorpecimiento de servicios\u201d, (CAU N\u00b0 29155\/16), in proceedings before the No. 13 National Criminal Court of Preliminary Investigation, the complaint that accused\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li>\t\t<\/ul>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 60px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"En la causa \u201cKalanik, T. &nbsp;s\/entorpecimiento de servicios\u201d, (CAU N\u00b0 29155\/16), 01\/08\/2016, en tr\u00e1mite ante el Juzgado Nacional de Instrucci\u00f3n en lo Criminal N\u00b0 13, se desestim\u00f3 la denuncia que acusaba a Uber por entorpecimiento del tr\u00e1nsito, asociaci\u00f3n il\u00edcita, instigaci\u00f3n [...]","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":14,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-2112","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2112"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4415,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2112\/revisions\/4415"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}