{"id":14,"date":"2024-05-27T15:55:12","date_gmt":"2024-05-27T15:55:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?page_id=14"},"modified":"2024-07-02T13:27:10","modified_gmt":"2024-07-02T13:27:10","slug":"jurisprudencia","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/jurisprudencia\/","title":{"rendered":"Jurisprudence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"edge-blog-list-holder edge-bl-standard edge-bl-four-columns edge-bl-normal-space edge-bl-pag-load-more\"  data-type=\"standard\" data-number-of-posts=\"20\" data-number-of-columns=\"4\" data-space-between-columns=\"normal\" data-category=\"jurisprudencia\" data-order-by=\"date\" data-order=\"ASC\" data-image-size=\"landscape\" data-title-tag=\"h4\" data-excerpt-length=\"30\" data-post-info-section=\"no\" data-post-info-image=\"yes\" data-post-info-author=\"yes\" data-post-info-date=\"no\" data-post-info-category=\"yes\" data-post-info-comments=\"no\" data-post-info-like=\"no\" data-post-info-share=\"no\" data-pagination-type=\"load-more\" data-max-num-pages=\"13\" data-next-page=\"2\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bl-wrapper\">\n\t\t<ul class=\"edge-blog-list\">\n\t\t\t<li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-50.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Inexistence of Employment Relationship (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cUber S.R.L. Y OTROS S\/INFRACCI\u00d3N LEY 24.769\u201d, (CAU N\u00ba 1859\/2017), the Court upheld the Public Prosecutor\u2019s motion to dismiss the complaint, holding that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-110.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Appeals: Drivers Are Not Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 26th of February, 2021, in the case \u201cUber Argentina S.R.L. Y OTROS s\/INF. LEY 24.769\u201d, (Expte N\u00ba 8627\/2016), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-recursos-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-111.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Commit The Crime of Money Laundering (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of November, 2022, in the case \u201cUber argentina s.r.l. y otros s\/inf. art .303\u2019\u2019, (CPE 648\/2021), the Court dismissed the money laundering accusation - at the request of the Public Prosecutor - on the grounds that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-cometio-el-delito-de-lavado-de-activos-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-107.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Uber Did Not Evade VAT Nor Income Tax: The Platform Is Operated From Abroad (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 26th of October, 2021, in the case \u201cUber Argentina SRL s\/infracci\u00f3n ley 24.760\u201d, (CPE 1838\/2016), the Court dismissed Uber on its alleged aggravated tax evasion regarding VAT and Income Tax.\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-evadio-el-impuesto-al-valor-agregado-ni-el-impuesto-a-las-ganancias-la-plataforma-es-operada-desde-el-exterior-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-108.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" title=\"Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)\">\n            Once Again It Is Ruled That Uber Did Not Evade Social Security Obligations: Drivers Are Not Considered Employees (National Court of Economic Crimes)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of December, 2020, in the case \u201cUber argentina s\/ inf. ley 24.769\u201d, (CPE 524\/2019\/2), the Court granted a dismissal due to lack of action, acquitting the defendants of their charges\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/una-vez-mas-se-determino-que-uber-no-evadio-aportes-de-la-seguridad-social-los-conductores-no-son-sus-empleados-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-penal-economico\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" title=\"Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-85.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" title=\"Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)\">\n            Supreme Court Upholds The Legality of Uber\u2019s Operations (Argentina\u2019s Supreme Court)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 14th of August, 2018, in the case \u201cRecurso de hecho deducido por el Sindicato de Peones de Taxis de la Capital Federal en la causa Uber y otros s\/ incidente de recurso extraordinario\u201d,\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-ratifica-la-legalidad-de-la-operacion-de-uber-csjn\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" title=\"It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-86.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" title=\"It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)\">\n            It Is Confirmed That Activity On Uber Is No Crime (National Chamber of Criminal and Correctional Appeals)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 3rd of November, 2016, in the case \u201cK., T. y otros\u201d, (CCC 29155\/2016\/CA1), the Chamber upheld the decision by the previous Court, recognising Uber\u2019s legality. It also added that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-confirma-que-la-actividad-de-uber-no-es-ningun-delito-camara-nacional-de-apelaciones-en-lo-criminal-y-correccional\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" title=\"Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-53.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" title=\"Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)\">\n            Uber Undertakes A Lawful Commercial Activity (National Criminal Court)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 1st of August, 2016, in the case \u201cKalanik, T.  s\/entorpecimiento de servicios\u201d, (CAU N\u00b0 29155\/16), in proceedings before the No. 13 National Criminal Court of Preliminary Investigation, the complaint that accused\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-desarrolla-una-actividad-comercial-licita-juzgado-nacional-en-lo-criminal\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-90.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty\">\n            Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Premature Enforcement Of Penalty            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 4th of September, 2023, in the case \u201cMejia Silva, Luis David sobre 6.1.47  \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (case No. 108976\/2023), the First Instance Court No. 13 in Criminal, Infractions, and Regulatory Matters declared null the proceedings\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-del-procedimiento-por-haber-existido-un-adelantamiento-de-pena\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-29.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" title=\"Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent\">\n            Proceedings Are Declared Null Due To Their Provocation By An Entrapment Agent            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of November, 2017, in the case \u201cMarquez, Jose Bonifacio s\/art. 1472:83 \u2013 Usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/ fines lucrativos\u201d, (case No. 258505\/2017), the proceedings were declared null for\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-lo-actuado-por-haber-sido-consecuencia-de-la-provocacion-de-un-agente-particular\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-91.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null\">\n            Retention Of Licence Is Declared Null            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 30th of March, 2022, in the case \u201cCrocci, Albano sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 26630\/2022-0), all proceedings at the administrative stage were declared null because\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-nulidad-de-la-retencion-de-licencia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-93.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence\">\n            Another Acquittal Due To Wrongful Retention Of Licence            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of October, 2019, in the case \u201cOjeda Eduardo Juan sobre 6.1.44 transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 39237\/2019-0), the Court acquitted the defendant and declared null the administrative ruling\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otra-absolucion-por-indebida-retencion-de-licencia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" title=\"Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-96.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" title=\"Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over\">\n            Criminal Action Against Uber Is Declared Over            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 6th of December, 2019, in the case \u201cIncidente de requerimiento a juicio en autos: Uber, Uber y otros sobre 1\u00b0 ley 26.735 \u2013 art. 1\u00b0- evasi\u00f3n simple. ley 26.735 (modificaci\u00f3n ley 24.769)\u201d, (Expte. INC 15712\/2016-10), the City of Buenos Aires initiated\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-declara-la-extincion-de-la-accion-penal-contra-uber\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" title=\"Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-59.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" title=\"Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details\">\n            Acquittal Due To Violation Of Right To A Fair Trial By Not Recording Passenger Details            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of March, 2021, in the case \u201cQuisbert Choque, David Fernando sobre 6.1.47 \u2013 requisitos de los veh\u00edculos de transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (CAU 3859\/2020-0), the Court acquitted the defendant\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/absolucion-por-afectacion-al-derecho-de-defensa-al-no-consignar-datos-del-pasajero\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" title=\"Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-63.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" title=\"Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)\">\n            Activity Carried Out On Uber Is Not A Public Service (Sole Regulatory Body of Public Services, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 2nd of July, 2020, in the case \u201cSindicato de peones de taxis de la capital federal y otros contra ministro de desarrollo urbano y transporte y otros sobre otras demandas contra autoridad administrativa \u2013 gen\u00e9rico\u201d, (File No. 3065\/2016-0), the representative for the Sole\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-actividad-desarrollada-por-uber-no-es-un-servicio-publico-ente-unico-regulador-de-servicios-publicos-de-la-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-58.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            Uber Does Not Violate The Offence Of Unlawful Commercial Use Of Public Space For Profit (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cUber y otros sobre 83 -Usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/fines lucrativos (no autorizados)\u201d, (File No. 17480\/19), the Court upheld the ruling of Chamber II of the Criminal\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-no-comete-la-contravencion-de-uso-lucrativo-del-espacio-publico-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-62.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            Driving Using Uber Is Not A Violation (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 10th of February, 2021, in the case \u201cSajoux, Nicol\u00e1s y otros s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Nicol\u00e1s Sajoux (UBER) s\/ infr. art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico c\/ fines lucrativos (no autorizadas)\u2019\u201d, (File No, 15859\/18), the Court acquitted\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-utilizando-uber-no-es-una-contravencion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-76.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of August, 2019, in the case \u201cUBER s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Incidente de apelaci\u00f3n en autos: UBER y otros s\/ art. 83, usar indebidamente el espacio p\u00fablico\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-ratifica-que-es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-92.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" title=\"It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)\">\n            It Is Unconstitutional To Block Uber\u2019s Website And Application (High Court of Justice, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 18th of June, 2018, in the case \u201cNN (UBER) s\/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: \u2018Incidente de apelaci\u00f3n por clausura\/bloqueo de p\u00e1gina web en todo el pa\u00eds en autos: NN\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-inconstitucional-bloquear-el-sitio-web-de-uber-y-la-aplicacion-tsj-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-95.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" title=\"Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)\">\n            Retention Of A Licence Is A Premature Enforcement Of A Penalty (Criminal and Infractions Court, CABA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 27th September, 2022, in the case \u201cIncidente de apelaci\u00f3n en autos Perez Ramos, Miguel Angel sobre 6.1.44 \u2013 Transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (INC 136886\/2021-1), the Second Chamber revoked the initial\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-retencion-de-licencia-es-un-adelantamiento-de-pena-pcyf-caba\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li>\t\t<\/ul>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-loading\">\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce1\"><\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce2\"><\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce3\"><\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-load-more\">\n\t\t<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-large edge-btn-solid\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Load more<\/span>    <\/a>\t<\/div>\n\t<input type=\"hidden\" id=\"edgtf_blog_load_more_nonce_6943\" name=\"edgtf_blog_load_more_nonce_6943\" value=\"ce474c1aed\" \/><input type=\"hidden\" name=\"_wp_http_referer\" value=\"\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\" \/><\/div><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 60px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"En la causa \u201cIncidente de apelaci\u00f3n en autos Perez Ramos, Miguel Angel sobre 6.1.44 - Transporte de pasajeros\u201d, (INC 136886\/2021-1), 27\/09\/2022, la Sala II revoc\u00f3 la sentencia de primera instancia que conden\u00f3 a la conductora por prestar el servicio de [...]","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-14","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101,"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions\/101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}