{"id":4156,"date":"2025-01-02T21:44:42","date_gmt":"2025-01-02T21:44:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4156"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:22:31","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:22:31","slug":"otro-sobreseimiento-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-sobreseimiento-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Acquittal For An UberMoto Driver"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 27th of September, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Franzois Guillermo Arturo N\u00e9stor<\/em>\u201d, the No. 2 Infractions Court dismissed the infractions report filed against the defendant. The Court considered that the act in question was not classified as an infraction under the regulations since it did not fit the type of infraction described in Article 1 Section 33 of Ordinance XVI No. 112 DM.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Franzois-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia desestima acta Franzois (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-90b261f0-e251-4272-9541-e6e1539479e5\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Franzois-1.pdf\">Sentencia desestima acta Franzois (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Sentencia-desestima-acta-Franzois-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-90b261f0-e251-4272-9541-e6e1539479e5\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 27\/09\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 2, en la causa \u201cFranzois Guillermo Arturo N\u00e9stor\u201d, desestim\u00f3 el acta de infracci\u00f3n labrada a nombre del imputado ya que consider\u00f3 que el hecho en cuesti\u00f3n no es calificado por la normativa [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,14,23,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-mendoza","category-legalidad","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4156"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4159,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4156\/revisions\/4159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}