{"id":4125,"date":"2024-12-18T14:15:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-18T14:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4125"},"modified":"2024-12-18T14:15:01","modified_gmt":"2024-12-18T14:15:01","slug":"otro-driver-sobreseido-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-la-ord-xvi-n-116","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-driver-sobreseido-por-falta-de-reglamentacion-de-la-ord-xvi-n-116\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Driver Acquitted Due To Lack of Regulation Of Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 116"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 23rd of September, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Pucheta Maximiliano Ram\u00f3n<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court acquitted the defendant on the grounds that, at that time, Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 116 had not been regulated. Additionally, it was unclear whether the transportation carried out was a public service or one through an electronic platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Pucheta-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia sobreseimiento Pucheta (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-0c2765f4-ae38-4463-b11a-6b34fe8a605f\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Pucheta-1.pdf\">Sentencia sobreseimiento Pucheta (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-sobreseimiento-Pucheta-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-0c2765f4-ae38-4463-b11a-6b34fe8a605f\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 23\/09\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No.1, en la causa \u201cPucheta Maximiliano Ram\u00f3n\u201d, consider\u00f3 que como al d\u00eda de la fecha no se ha reglamentado la Ord. XVI N\u00b0 116 no se ha reglamentado, y que a su vez [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,16,140,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4125"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4128,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125\/revisions\/4128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}