{"id":4108,"date":"2024-12-17T14:06:10","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T14:06:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4108"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:16:28","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:16:28","slug":"ubermoto-es-claramente-legal-en-posadas-nueva-absolucion-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/ubermoto-es-claramente-legal-en-posadas-nueva-absolucion-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto\/","title":{"rendered":"UberMoto Is Clearly Legal In Posadas: New UberMoto Driver Acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 20th of August, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Lamberg Walter Daniel<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Administrative Infractions Court acquitted the defendant, underlining that at that time Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 116 was not regulated, no Registry of Service Providers had been created nor had an Enforcement Authority been established. Additionally, the Court emphasised the prohibition of both applying ordinances by analogy and interpreting them <em>\u201cin malam partem\u201d <\/em>, that is to say, against the defendant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Lamberg.docx-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia absolutoria Lamberg.docx (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-59341d36-92f5-4fa9-9365-e70469bed212\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Lamberg.docx-1.pdf\">Sentencia absolutoria Lamberg.docx (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Lamberg.docx-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-59341d36-92f5-4fa9-9365-e70469bed212\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 20\/08\/2024, en Juzgado Administrativo de Faltas No. 1, en el marco de la causa \u201cLamberg Walter Daniel\u201d, sobresey\u00f3 al imputado resaltando que al d\u00eda de la fecha la Ordenanza XVI No. 116 no se encuentra reglamentada, no habi\u00e9ndose creado [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37,141,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4108"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4111,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4108\/revisions\/4111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}