{"id":4104,"date":"2024-12-17T14:01:02","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T14:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4104"},"modified":"2024-12-17T14:01:02","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T14:01:02","slug":"nueva-absolucion-del-juzgado-de-faltas-no-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nueva-absolucion-del-juzgado-de-faltas-no-1\/","title":{"rendered":"New Acquittal In No. 1 Infractions Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the 14th of August, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Gutierrez Elsa Agustina<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Administrative Infractions Court acquitted the defendant, who drove using the Uber platform. The Court considered that, at that time, it had not been established what kind of authorisation those providing transportation services contracted through electronic platforms should have, emphasising that Ordinance XVI - N\u00b0 19 prohibits the application of ordinances by analogy and the interpretation of them against the defendant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Gutierrez-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia absolutoria Guti\u00e9rrez (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-97d0b026-429e-4456-bd96-203480bf319a\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Gutierrez-1.pdf\">Sentencia absolutoria Guti\u00e9rrez (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Gutierrez-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-97d0b026-429e-4456-bd96-203480bf319a\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 14\/08\/2024, en la causa \u201cGutierrez Elsa Agustina\u201d, el 14\/08\/2024, el Juzgado Administrativo de Faltas No. 1, sobresey\u00f3 al imputado, quien conduc\u00eda utilizando la plataforma Uber, por considerar que al d\u00eda de la fecha, no se ha establecido con qu\u00e9 [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[50,37,141,16,23,140,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-absolucion","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4104"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4104\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4107,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4104\/revisions\/4107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}