{"id":4100,"date":"2024-12-17T13:54:35","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T13:54:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4100"},"modified":"2025-01-27T22:16:45","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T22:16:45","slug":"conducir-con-ubermoto-no-es-una-falta-para-la-justicia-administrativa-de-posadas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/conducir-con-ubermoto-no-es-una-falta-para-la-justicia-administrativa-de-posadas\/","title":{"rendered":"Driving With UberMoto Is Not An Infraction According To The Administrative Court of Posadas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 14th of August, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Lugo C\u00e9sar Gabriel<\/em>\u201d, the No. 2 Administrative Infractions Court acquitted the defendant. The Court held that, since the defendant did not comply with any of the established criteria to be considered a passenger or cargo transportation vehicle, it could not charge him with the infraction, as established in Article 1 Section 33 of Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 112. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-Absolutoria-Lugo-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia Absolutoria Lugo (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-7e243e49-2eaf-484b-94b7-83639aa034ed\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-Absolutoria-Lugo-1.pdf\">Sentencia Absolutoria Lugo (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-Absolutoria-Lugo-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-7e243e49-2eaf-484b-94b7-83639aa034ed\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En el marco de la causa \u201cLugo C\u00e9sar Gabriel\u201d, el d\u00eda 14\/08\/2024, el Juzgado Administrativo de Faltas No. 2 absolvi\u00f3 al imputado sosteniendo que, al no cumplir con ninguno de los criterios establecidos para ser considerado un veh\u00edculo de transporte [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[50,37,16,23,140,49,146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-absolucion","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-legalidad","category-prohibicion-de-analogia","category-sobreseimiento","category-ubermoto"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4100"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4103,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100\/revisions\/4103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}