{"id":4088,"date":"2024-12-17T12:24:15","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T12:24:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?p=4088"},"modified":"2024-12-17T12:24:16","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T12:24:16","slug":"la-justicia-municipal-de-posadas-mantiene-firme-su-criterio-absolutorio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-municipal-de-posadas-mantiene-firme-su-criterio-absolutorio\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00a0Municipal Court of Posadas Upholds Acquittal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the 17th of May, 2024, in the case \u201c<em>Diaz Ram\u00f3n Eduardo<\/em>\u201d, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court acquitted the defendant on the grounds that Ordinance XVI N\u00b0 109 was not regulated. The Court held that the \u201c<em>the guidelines to infractions proceedings establish that it is impossible to take an infraction case to court without a prior accusation or omission that have been classified by an ordinance in force prior to the events in question. No other ordinance may be applied by analogy, nor may the regulation be interpreted extensively against the defendant, and if in doubt the court should err in favor of the defendant\".<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Diaz-1.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Sentencia absolutoria D\u00edaz (1).\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-7c817b5b-5e73-42f9-bec0-b87fc29b119e\" href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Diaz-1.pdf\">Sentencia absolutoria D\u00edaz (1)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Sentencia-absolutoria-Diaz-1.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-7c817b5b-5e73-42f9-bec0-b87fc29b119e\">Descarga<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El 17\/05\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No.1, en la causa \u201cDiaz Ram\u00f3n Eduardo\u201d, sobresey\u00f3 al imputado en base a que la Ord. XVI N\u00b0 109 no est\u00e1 reglamentada y que los \u201cprincipios rectores del procedimiento de faltas establecen la [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[50,37,141,16,140],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-absolucion","category-atipicidad-de-la-conducta-delictiva","category-falta-de-reglamentacion","category-jurisprudencia-de-misiones","category-prohibicion-de-analogia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4088"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4088\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4091,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4088\/revisions\/4091"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}