{"id":3680,"date":"2024-10-25T16:07:15","date_gmt":"2024-10-25T16:07:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?page_id=3680"},"modified":"2025-05-13T16:10:33","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T16:10:33","slug":"mendoza","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/mendoza\/","title":{"rendered":"Mendoza"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 160px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"wpb_text_column wpb_content_element\" >\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\">City of Mendoza<\/h5>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"edge-blog-list-holder edge-bl-standard edge-bl-four-columns edge-bl-normal-space edge-bl-pag-no-pagination\"  data-type=\"standard\" data-number-of-posts=\"20\" data-number-of-columns=\"4\" data-space-between-columns=\"normal\" data-category=\"jurisprudencia-de-mendoza\" data-order-by=\"date\" data-order=\"ASC\" data-image-size=\"landscape\" data-title-tag=\"h4\" data-excerpt-length=\"30\" data-post-info-section=\"no\" data-post-info-image=\"yes\" data-post-info-author=\"yes\" data-post-info-date=\"no\" data-post-info-category=\"yes\" data-post-info-comments=\"no\" data-post-info-like=\"no\" data-post-info-share=\"no\" data-pagination-type=\"no-pagination\" data-max-num-pages=\"1\" data-next-page=\"2\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bl-wrapper\">\n\t\t<ul class=\"edge-blog-list\">\n\t\t\t<li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tribunal-de-mendoza-rechaza-accion-de-amparo-solicitada-por-aprotam\/\" title=\"Mendoza Court Rejects Amparo Action Filed by APROTAM\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-32.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tribunal-de-mendoza-rechaza-accion-de-amparo-solicitada-por-aprotam\/\" title=\"Mendoza Court Rejects Amparo Action Filed by APROTAM\">\n            Mendoza Court Rejects Amparo Action Filed by APROTAM            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 14th of May, 2019, in the case \u201cAsociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios de Taxi de Mendoza (APROTAM) c\/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza p\/acci\u00f3n de amparo\u201d, (CAU CUIJ N\u00b0 13-04464442-2), the Court rejected\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/tribunal-de-mendoza-rechaza-accion-de-amparo-solicitada-por-aprotam\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-constitucional-regular-a-uber-y-a-los-taxis-de-manera-diferenciada-suprema-corte-de-mendoza\/\" title=\"It Is Constitutional To Regulate Uber And Taxis In Different Ways (Supreme Court of Mendoza)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-101.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-constitucional-regular-a-uber-y-a-los-taxis-de-manera-diferenciada-suprema-corte-de-mendoza\/\" title=\"It Is Constitutional To Regulate Uber And Taxis In Different Ways (Supreme Court of Mendoza)\">\n            It Is Constitutional To Regulate Uber And Taxis In Different Ways (Supreme Court of Mendoza)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 19th of May, 2022, in the case \u201cAsociaci\u00f3n de Propietarios de Taxi de Mendoza \u2013 APROTAM c\/ Gobierno de la Provincia de Mendoza p\/ acci\u00f3n de inconstitucionalidad\u201d, (CAU CUIJ N\u00b0 13-04410472-9), the Supreme Court\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/es-constitucional-regular-a-uber-y-a-los-taxis-de-manera-diferenciada-suprema-corte-de-mendoza\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-sobreseimiento-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal For An UberMoto Driver\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/young-attractive-loving-couple-scooter-outdoors-looking-aside-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-sobreseimiento-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto\/\" title=\"Another Acquittal For An UberMoto Driver\">\n            Another Acquittal For An UberMoto Driver            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 27th of September, 2024, in the case \u201cFranzois Guillermo Arturo N\u00e9stor\u201d, the No. 2 Infractions Court dismissed the infractions report filed against the defendant. The Court considered\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-sobreseimiento-a-un-conductor-de-ubermoto\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li>\t\t<\/ul>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 60px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"El 27\/09\/2024, el Juzgado Municipal de Faltas No. 2, en la causa \u201cFranzois Guillermo Arturo N\u00e9stor\u201d, desestim\u00f3 el acta de infracci\u00f3n labrada a nombre del imputado ya que consider\u00f3 que el hecho en cuesti\u00f3n no es calificado por la normativa [...]","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-3680","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3680"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3680\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4429,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3680\/revisions\/4429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}