{"id":2131,"date":"2024-06-24T20:27:52","date_gmt":"2024-06-24T20:27:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/?page_id=2131"},"modified":"2025-05-12T15:54:01","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:54:01","slug":"jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/jurisprudencia\/jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional\/","title":{"rendered":"International Labour Jurisprudence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid\"><div class=\"wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 160px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"wpb_text_column wpb_content_element  vc_custom_1747065229612\" >\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<pre style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>International Labour Jurisprudence\r\n\r\n\r\n<\/strong><\/pre>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"edge-blog-list-holder edge-bl-standard edge-bl-four-columns edge-bl-normal-space edge-bl-pag-load-more\"  data-type=\"standard\" data-number-of-posts=\"20\" data-number-of-columns=\"4\" data-space-between-columns=\"normal\" data-category=\"jurisprudencia-laboral-internacional\" data-order-by=\"date\" data-order=\"ASC\" data-image-size=\"landscape\" data-title-tag=\"h4\" data-excerpt-length=\"30\" data-post-info-section=\"no\" data-post-info-image=\"yes\" data-post-info-author=\"yes\" data-post-info-date=\"no\" data-post-info-category=\"yes\" data-post-info-comments=\"no\" data-post-info-like=\"no\" data-post-info-share=\"no\" data-pagination-type=\"load-more\" data-max-num-pages=\"2\" data-next-page=\"2\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bl-wrapper\">\n\t\t<ul class=\"edge-blog-list\">\n\t\t\t<li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/desestimacion-de-la-pretension-por-relacion-laboral-inexistente\/\" title=\"Dismissal Of Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-22.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/desestimacion-de-la-pretension-por-relacion-laboral-inexistente\/\" title=\"Dismissal Of Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship\">\n            Dismissal Of Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 15th of January, 2021, in the case \u201cAziz Al Hakmaoui c\/ SARL Uber B.V, SASU Uber France\u201d, the Lyon Appeal Court\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/desestimacion-de-la-pretension-por-relacion-laboral-inexistente\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-falta-de-control-que-ejerce-uber-sobre-los-drivers-es-un-elemento-que-demuestra-la-falta-de-relacion-laboral\/\" title=\"The Lack Of Control That Uber Exercises Over Drivers Is An Element That Proves The Lack Of An Employment Relationship\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-170.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-falta-de-control-que-ejerce-uber-sobre-los-drivers-es-un-elemento-que-demuestra-la-falta-de-relacion-laboral\/\" title=\"The Lack Of Control That Uber Exercises Over Drivers Is An Element That Proves The Lack Of An Employment Relationship\">\n            The Lack Of Control That Uber Exercises Over Drivers Is An Element That Proves The Lack Of An Employment Relationship            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 21st of June, 2022, in the case \u201cAsim Nawaz v. Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd T\/A Uber B.V.\u201d, the Fair Work Commission\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-falta-de-control-que-ejerce-uber-sobre-los-drivers-es-un-elemento-que-demuestra-la-falta-de-relacion-laboral\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-la-relacion-contractual-entre-los-socios-conductores-y-uber-no-concurren-las-manifestaciones-del-vinculo-de-subordinacion-y-dependencia\/\" title=\"In The Contractual Relationship Between Uber Drivers and Uber, The Characterising Elements Of Subordination And Dependence Are Not Present\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-20.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-la-relacion-contractual-entre-los-socios-conductores-y-uber-no-concurren-las-manifestaciones-del-vinculo-de-subordinacion-y-dependencia\/\" title=\"In The Contractual Relationship Between Uber Drivers and Uber, The Characterising Elements Of Subordination And Dependence Are Not Present\">\n            In The Contractual Relationship Between Uber Drivers and Uber, The Characterising Elements Of Subordination And Dependence Are Not Present            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 27th of April, 2023, the Valpara\u00edso Labour Court dismissed the claim filed by Rodrigo Cabrera, Olmos and another 49 drivers against Hinter Chile SpA, Uber Portier Chile SpA, Uber Chile SpA\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-la-relacion-contractual-entre-los-socios-conductores-y-uber-no-concurren-las-manifestaciones-del-vinculo-de-subordinacion-y-dependencia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-no-es-una-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"The Relationship Between Uber And An Uber Driver Is Not An Employment Relationship\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-171.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-no-es-una-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"The Relationship Between Uber And An Uber Driver Is Not An Employment Relationship\">\n            The Relationship Between Uber And An Uber Driver Is Not An Employment Relationship            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 8th of March, 2019, in the case \u201cAziz Al Hakmaoui c\/ SARL Uber B.V, SASU Uber France\u201d, the Lyon Employment Court was declared\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-no-es-una-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-es-un-plataforma-que-conecta-conductores-privados-no-subordinados-a-ella-con-pasajeros\/\" title=\"Uber Is A Platform That Connects Passengers With Private Drivers, Not Employees of It\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-23.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-es-un-plataforma-que-conecta-conductores-privados-no-subordinados-a-ella-con-pasajeros\/\" title=\"Uber Is A Platform That Connects Passengers With Private Drivers, Not Employees of It\">\n            Uber Is A Platform That Connects Passengers With Private Drivers, Not Employees of It            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of October, 2022, in the case brought by Uber M\u00e9xico Technology &amp; Software, Sociedad Anonima de Capital Variable against the Government of Puebla State, the district judge declared unconstitutional\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/uber-es-un-plataforma-que-conecta-conductores-privados-no-subordinados-a-ella-con-pasajeros\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-los-socios-conductores-no-es-de-tipo-laboral\/\" title=\"The Relationship Between Uber And Uber Driver Is Not Of An Employment Nature\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-172.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-los-socios-conductores-no-es-de-tipo-laboral\/\" title=\"The Relationship Between Uber And Uber Driver Is Not Of An Employment Nature\">\n            The Relationship Between Uber And Uber Driver Is Not Of An Employment Nature            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of September, 2017, in the complaint brought by Hugo Humberto Ospina Agudelo - President of the Association of Taxi Owners and Drivers against Uber Colombia S.A.S., before\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-relacion-entre-uber-y-los-socios-conductores-no-es-de-tipo-laboral\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-son-empleados-de-la-aplicacion\/\" title=\"Uber Drivers Are Not Employees Of The Application\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-132.png\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-son-empleados-de-la-aplicacion\/\" title=\"Uber Drivers Are Not Employees Of The Application\">\n            Uber Drivers Are Not Employees Of The Application            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 11th of April, 2018, in the case \u201cRazak v. Uber Techs., Inc.\u201d, the District Court in Pennsylvania ruled that Uber drivers (in this specific case, those offering an Uber Black service) are\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-son-empleados-de-la-aplicacion\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-australia-el-tribunal-nacional-de-trabajo-resolvio-la-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-eats-y-sus-repartidores\/\" title=\"In Australia, The Fair Work Commission Ruled The Inexistence Of An Employment Relationship Between Uber Eats And Its Deliverymen\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-24.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-australia-el-tribunal-nacional-de-trabajo-resolvio-la-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-eats-y-sus-repartidores\/\" title=\"In Australia, The Fair Work Commission Ruled The Inexistence Of An Employment Relationship Between Uber Eats And Its Deliverymen\">\n            In Australia, The Fair Work Commission Ruled The Inexistence Of An Employment Relationship Between Uber Eats And Its Deliverymen            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 21st of April, 2020, in the case \u201cAmita Gupta v. Portier Pacific Pty Ltd; Uber Australia Pty Ltd t\/a Uber Eats\u201d, (C2019\/5651), Australia\u2019s Fair Work Commission ruled that no employment relationship\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-australia-el-tribunal-nacional-de-trabajo-resolvio-la-inexistencia-de-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-eats-y-sus-repartidores\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/juzgado-de-chile-rechaza-demanda-por-no-existir-relacion-de-trabajo-entre-las-partes\/\" title=\"Chile Court Rejects Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship Between Parties\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-128.png\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/juzgado-de-chile-rechaza-demanda-por-no-existir-relacion-de-trabajo-entre-las-partes\/\" title=\"Chile Court Rejects Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship Between Parties\">\n            Chile Court Rejects Claim Due To Lack Of Employment Relationship Between Parties            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 14th of July, 2015, in the case \u201cRonald Andr\u00e9s Thomson Cu\u00f1ado v. Uber Chile SPA\u201d, the Labour Court of Santiago\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/juzgado-de-chile-rechaza-demanda-por-no-existir-relacion-de-trabajo-entre-las-partes\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-del-estado-de-california-no-tiene-jurisdiccion-para-tratar-la-demanda-por-no-enmarcarse-en-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"The California Labour Commission Does Not Have The Jurisdiction To Hear The Claim As It Is Not Encompassed By An Employment Relationship\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-21.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-del-estado-de-california-no-tiene-jurisdiccion-para-tratar-la-demanda-por-no-enmarcarse-en-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"The California Labour Commission Does Not Have The Jurisdiction To Hear The Claim As It Is Not Encompassed By An Employment Relationship\">\n            The California Labour Commission Does Not Have The Jurisdiction To Hear The Claim As It Is Not Encompassed By An Employment Relationship            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 1st of August, 2012, in the case \u201cRashid Alatraqchi, vs. Uber Technologies, Inc. a Delaware corporation\u201d, (state case number: 11-42020 CT), the California Labour Commission\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-del-estado-de-california-no-tiene-jurisdiccion-para-tratar-la-demanda-por-no-enmarcarse-en-relacion-de-trabajo\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-puerto-rico-se-rechaza-reclamo-laboral-contra-uber-afirmando-la-inexistencia-de-contrato-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"In Puerto Rico, The Employment Claim Against Uber Is Rejected, Affirming That An Employment Contract Does Not Exist\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-18.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-puerto-rico-se-rechaza-reclamo-laboral-contra-uber-afirmando-la-inexistencia-de-contrato-de-trabajo\/\" title=\"In Puerto Rico, The Employment Claim Against Uber Is Rejected, Affirming That An Employment Contract Does Not Exist\">\n            In Puerto Rico, The Employment Claim Against Uber Is Rejected, Affirming That An Employment Contract Does Not Exist            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 5th of April, 2018, in the case \u201cMercedes Ramos de Avil\u00e9s vs. Uber CT Corporation System\u201d, (Caso: 18-26-14056), the State Insurance Fund Corporation determined that\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/en-puerto-rico-se-rechaza-reclamo-laboral-contra-uber-afirmando-la-inexistencia-de-contrato-de-trabajo\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-de-chicago-tambien-determino-que-no-existe-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-usa\/\" title=\"The Chicago Commission Also Decides That No Employment Relationship Exists Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-156.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-de-chicago-tambien-determino-que-no-existe-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-usa\/\" title=\"The Chicago Commission Also Decides That No Employment Relationship Exists Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)\">\n            The Chicago Commission Also Decides That No Employment Relationship Exists Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cAbdul Mohammed Complaint, v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Respondent\u201d, (Case No. 15-E-77), a Commission decided\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-de-chicago-tambien-determino-que-no-existe-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-usa\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-consejo-de-paris-afirma-que-el-conflicto-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-es-comercial-no-laboral-francia\/\" title=\"The Paris Council Affirms That The Conflict Between Uber And Uber Drivers Is Commercial, Not Employment-Related (France)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-149.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-consejo-de-paris-afirma-que-el-conflicto-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-es-comercial-no-laboral-francia\/\" title=\"The Paris Council Affirms That The Conflict Between Uber And Uber Drivers Is Commercial, Not Employment-Related (France)\">\n            The Paris Council Affirms That The Conflict Between Uber And Uber Drivers Is Commercial, Not Employment-Related (France)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 28th of June, 2018, in the case \u201cJudgment on the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction Ruling at first instance and in contested proceedings\u201d, (File No. F 17\/04674), the Court\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/el-consejo-de-paris-afirma-que-el-conflicto-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-es-comercial-no-laboral-francia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-de-australia-tambien-decreto-que-no-hay-contrato-de-trabajo-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-australia\/\" title=\"The Australia Justice Also Decreed That There Is No Employment Contract Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Australia)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-17.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-de-australia-tambien-decreto-que-no-hay-contrato-de-trabajo-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-australia\/\" title=\"The Australia Justice Also Decreed That There Is No Employment Contract Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Australia)\">\n            The Australia Justice Also Decreed That There Is No Employment Contract Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Australia)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn 2016, in the case \u201cOze Igiehon vs Rasier Operations BV\u201d, the Court ruled against the \u201cwrongful dismissal\u201d claim and affirmed that the relationship between parties - driver and Uber - was\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-justicia-de-australia-tambien-decreto-que-no-hay-contrato-de-trabajo-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-australia\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-de-california-tambien-determino-inexistencia-del-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-que-utilizan-la-app-usa\/\" title=\"The California Labour Commission Also Determines That An Employment Relationship Does Not Exist Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-175.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-de-california-tambien-determino-inexistencia-del-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-que-utilizan-la-app-usa\/\" title=\"The California Labour Commission Also Determines That An Employment Relationship Does Not Exist Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)\">\n            The California Labour Commission Also Determines That An Employment Relationship Does Not Exist Between Uber And Uber Drivers (USA)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 23rd of November, 2016, in the case \u201cUBER Technologies, Inc. et al. vs Y.E\u201d, (11-42020CT), the Californian Court affirmed that an employment relationship does not\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-comision-laboral-de-california-tambien-determino-inexistencia-del-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-los-conductores-que-utilizan-la-app-usa\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-del-reino-unido-determino-que-los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-estan-en-relacion-de-dependencia-uk\/\" title=\"The UK\u2019s Supreme Court Determined That Uber Drivers Are Not In An Employment Relationship (UK)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-12.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-del-reino-unido-determino-que-los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-estan-en-relacion-de-dependencia-uk\/\" title=\"The UK\u2019s Supreme Court Determined That Uber Drivers Are Not In An Employment Relationship (UK)\">\n            The UK\u2019s Supreme Court Determined That Uber Drivers Are Not In An Employment Relationship (UK)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nIn the case \u201cUber B.V. y otros c\/ Aslam y otros\u201d, the UK\u2019s Supreme Court ruled that individuals that have contracts with Uber\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/la-corte-suprema-del-reino-unido-determino-que-los-conductores-que-utilizan-uber-no-estan-en-relacion-de-dependencia-uk\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-juzgado-coincide-con-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"Another Court Agrees That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-173.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-juzgado-coincide-con-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"Another Court Agrees That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n            Another Court Agrees That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 22nd of March, 2019, in the case \u201cMauricio de Souza Dinucci vs. Uber do Brasil\u201d, (expte. N\u00b0 0101036-14.2017.5.01.00421), the Court determined\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/otro-juzgado-coincide-con-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nueva-decision-que-reafirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"New Decision Reaffirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-174.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nueva-decision-que-reafirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"New Decision Reaffirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n            New Decision Reaffirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 23rd of May, 2017, in the case \u201cRodrido Leonardo Silva Ferreira vs. Uber do Brasil Tecnolog\u00eda Ltda\u201d, (Proceso N\u00b0 0011359-34.2016.5.03.0112), the Court\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/nueva-decision-que-reafirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/un-nuevo-precedente-en-el-que-se-afirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"A New Precedent Affirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-166.jpg\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/un-nuevo-precedente-en-el-que-se-afirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"A New Precedent Affirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n            A New Precedent Affirms That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber And Uber Drivers (Brazil)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 21st of March, 2019, in the case \u201cFabio Gil Da Silva vs. Uber do Brasil\u201d (expte. N\u00b0 0010148-42.2019.5.03.0181), the Court found that the Uber app is limited to connecting drivers with users\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/un-nuevo-precedente-en-el-que-se-afirma-que-no-hay-vinculo-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li><li class=\"edge-bl-item clearfix\">\n\t<div class=\"edge-bli-inner\">\n                \n\t<div class=\"edge-post-image\">\n        \t\t    <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-reitera-que-no-hay-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"It Is Reiterated That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n                            <img decoding=\"async\" itemprop=\"image\" class=\"edge-custom-post-image\" src=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/uber-147.png\" alt=\"Blog list featured image\" \/>\n                \t\t    <\/a>\n        \t<\/div>\n                <div class=\"edge-bli-content\">\n                        \n<h4 itemprop=\"name\" class=\"entry-title edge-post-title\">\n            <a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-reitera-que-no-hay-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" title=\"It Is Reiterated That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)\">\n            It Is Reiterated That There Is No Employment Relationship Between Uber and Uber Drivers (Brazil)            <\/a>\n    <\/h4>                        <div class=\"edge-bli-excerpt\">\n                \t\t<div class=\"edge-post-excerpt-holder\">\n\t\t\t<p itemprop=\"description\" class=\"edge-post-excerpt\">\n\t\t\t\t\nOn the 6th of March, 2019, in the case \u201cEutalio Barcelos Camargo vs. Uber do Brasil\u201d, (expte. N\u00b0 0010159-65.2019.5.03.0183), the Court held that the drivers; ability to choose\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t                <div class=\"edge-post-read-more-button\">\n<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/se-reitera-que-no-hay-relacion-laboral-entre-uber-y-el-conductor-brasil\/\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-medium edge-btn-simple edge-blog-list-button\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Read More<\/span>    <\/a><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/li>\t\t<\/ul>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-loading\">\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce1\"><\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce2\"><\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-bounce3\"><\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<div class=\"edge-blog-pag-load-more\">\n\t\t<a itemprop=\"url\" href=\"\" target=\"_self\"  class=\"edge-btn edge-btn-large edge-btn-solid\"  >    <span class=\"edge-btn-text\">Load more<\/span>    <\/a>\t<\/div>\n\t<input type=\"hidden\" id=\"edgtf_blog_load_more_nonce_6105\" name=\"edgtf_blog_load_more_nonce_6105\" value=\"d4db742f1c\" \/><input type=\"hidden\" name=\"_wp_http_referer\" value=\"\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2131\" \/><\/div><div class=\"vc_empty_space\"   style=\"height: 60px\"><span class=\"vc_empty_space_inner\"><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"En la causa \u201cEutalio Barcelos Camargo vs. Uber do Brasil\u201d, (expte. N\u00b0 0010159-65.2019.5.03.0183), 06\/03\/2019,el Tribunal consider\u00f3 que la posibilidad que tienen los conductores de escoger la zona geogr\u00e1fica dentro de la cual prestar sus servicios y la libre determinaci\u00f3n del [...]","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":14,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-2131","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2131"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4410,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2131\/revisions\/4410"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ubereslegal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}