Ubereslegal – Doctrina, Jurisprudencia y noticias relacionadas

Jujuy Court Declares Null The Proceedings Against An Uber Driver
On the 14th of October, 2024, in the case “Apelación de Juzgado de Faltas Municipales: Espinosa Zalazar, José María c/ Municipalidad de San Salvador de Jujuy”, File No. C-247996/24, the Seat 3 of the Second Chamber of the Administrative Litigation Court in the Jujuy Province [...]
Another Ruling in Bariloche Highlights the Requirement to Precisely Indicate the Essential Elements for the Establishment of a Transportation Contract
For the Infractions Court in Bariloche, it is necessary to precisely specify the circumstances and essential elements in the configuration of a transportation contract, as well as [...]
“Being Uber” is Not Enough: Infringement Reports Must Include All Elements of the Transportation Contract and Be Accompanied by Other Evidence
On the 11th of March, 2025, in the case “Herrera Pablo Humberto”, the Puerto Madryn Municipal Infractions Court acquitted an individual charged with providing transportation services through Uber
Once Again, A Tucumán Province Court Removes The Requirement Of Advance Payment Of A Fine In Order To Appeal It
On the 22nd of August, 2024, in the case “Sosa Carlos Enrique S/ Recurso De Queja Por Apelacion Denegada”, (Expte: 1785/2024), the Conventional Secretary of the Judicial Power of Tucumán granted a citizen’s request to be able to recuperate [...]
Jurisprudence In Favour Of UberMoto’s Legality Is Consolidated
On the 15th of May, 2024, in the case “Ramírez Da Silva Cristian Natanael”, the No. 1 Municipal Infractions Court acquitted a driver on the grounds that: (i) any charge or oversight must be classified as an infraction [...]
Misiones Court Acquits A Driver Due To Lack Of Regulation
On the 25th of September, 2024, in the case “Alarcon Ezequiel Timoteo s/ apelación”, Expte. N° 13203-AP/2024, the No. 1 Juvenile Criminal Court of the 3rd District of Misiones acquitted a driver on the grounds that ordinances cannot be applied by analogy [...]
The Municipal Infractions Court in Río Grande Fulfills the Arranged Dues in the Case “Martínez Leonardo Alberto re: appeal under Article 23, Section 5 of the Penal Code”
On the 8th of October, 2024, in the case “Novoa Monica Leopoldina s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260164, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court dismissed the defendant upon recognising that there existed common elements with [...]
Acquittal of a Driver Due to Possible Participation of an Entrapment Agent
On the 3rd of October, 2024, in the case “Grahl Juan José s/ infringir O.M. 3548/16 Mod. 4627/23”, Expte. 260309, the Municipal Administrative Infractions Court, considering the possible involvement of an entrapment agent [...]

News

Jujuy Court Declares Null The Proceedings Against An Uber Driver

Another Ruling in Bariloche Highlights the Requirement to Precisely Indicate the Essential Elements for the Establishment of a Transportation Contract

“Being Uber” is Not Enough: Infringement Reports Must Include All Elements of the Transportation Contract and Be Accompanied by Other Evidence

Once Again, A Tucumán Province Court Removes The Requirement Of Advance Payment Of A Fine In Order To Appeal It

Jurisprudence In Favour Of UberMoto’s Legality Is Consolidated

Misiones Court Acquits A Driver Due To Lack Of Regulation

The Municipal Infractions Court in Río Grande Fulfills the Arranged Dues in the Case “Martínez Leonardo Alberto re: appeal under Article 23, Section 5 of the Penal Code”

Acquittal of a Driver Due to Possible Participation of an Entrapment Agent

Centenario: nulidad de procedimiento de control por participación de un agente provocador

Another Ruling in Tierra del Fuego Reaffirms the Unconstitutionality of the Ordinance Banning Uber

“Being Uber” is Not Enough: Infringement Reports Must Include All Elements of the Transportation Contract and Be Accompanied by Other Evidence

Tierra del Fuego Court Once Again Clearly States That Uber is Legal

The Municipal Infractions Court in Río Grande Fulfills the Arranged Dues in the Case “Martínez Leonardo Alberto re: appeal under Article 23, Section 5 of the Penal Code”

Acquittal of a Driver Due to Possible Participation of an Entrapment Agent

Once Again, A Tucumán Province Court Removes The Requirement Of Advance Payment Of A Fine In Order To Appeal It

Another Infringement Report is Rejected on account of the Non-Punishability of an Attempt

Another Ruling in Bariloche Highlights the Requirement to Precisely Indicate the Essential Elements for the Establishment of a Transportation Contract

An Attempt is Not Punishable: Dismissal of an Infringement Report in One Uber Case for Not Having Started the Journey

Dismissal in La Rioja Due to Violation of the Right to a Defence

Jujuy Court Once Again Acquits A Driver Due To The Clear Nullity of the Proceedings Taken Against Him